010101010101

5 ms·

1.
by 010101010101 12d ago
It’s about 20% of the vertical screen space on an iPhone, maddening.
2.
by 010101010101 2mo ago
Your apparent problems with Git the source control system aren’t what any of this is talking about, this is about GitHub as a platform. SourceForge is your better “pre-git” analogue here, and it, like SVN, still exists and is actively main
3.
by 010101010101 3mo ago
> The solution to uncertain information isn't more information, which the AI can certainly provide, it's better information, and AI cannot currently provide that. I'd argue that AI _can_ currently provide that, but that it
4.
by 010101010101 4mo ago
Those are measuring the utility of a technological advancement by looking at usage, not the pace of advancement of said technology.
5.
by 010101010101 5mo ago
The driving is the part before and after the stopping, which is the parking.
6.
by 010101010101 8mo ago
Pump and dump is not the same as competition resulting in winners and losers, it’s a grift by the losers to profit at the expense of users through deception.
7.
by 010101010101 10mo ago
It's used for a specific component in the start menu, it doesn't power the entire start menu.
8.
by 010101010101 11mo ago
This was a false rumor: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44124688
9.
by 010101010101 11mo ago
> If you don't need what kafka offers, don't use it. This is literally the point the author is making.
10.
by 010101010101 11mo ago
If you have a mechanism that can prove arbitrary program correctness with 100% accuracy you’re sitting on something more valuable than LLMs.
11.
by 010101010101 11mo ago
You’re absolutely right!
12.
by 010101010101 11mo ago
Why stop at one? Imagine how much safer we’d be with TWO cops per citizen! And all those extra jobs that would be created!
13.
by 010101010101 11mo ago
If I make a list of people’s private information publicly accessible on accident without their permission and you access it which one of us is liable?
14.
by 010101010101 11mo ago
You can buy thousands of lottery tickets and it won't meaningfully impact your odds of winning though. You can also go stand outside in a field with a metal rod in your hand during a thunderstorm. "You" isn't really the
15.
by 010101010101 11mo ago
Those two things don’t sound mutually exclusive to me.
16.
by 010101010101 11mo ago
> When a lottery happens, there is always a winner, that's how they work. It's possible this is a language and cultural thing, but most (possibly all?) state run lotteries in the United States don't work this way - they si
17.
by 010101010101 11mo ago
That’s not true either though - someone eventually always wins the lottery, someone eventually always gets struck by lightning. The latter usually happens before the former.
18.
by 010101010101 11mo ago
> it's much more likely that someone wins the lottery this week (~100% in fact) than that someone gets struck by lightning this week No it isn’t? Not only are the individual odds of winning the lottery lower than the individual odds
19.
by 010101010101 11mo ago
https://youtu.be/bpiu8UtQ-6E?si=ogmfFPbmLICoMvr3 "I'm closer to LeBron than you are to me."
20.
by 010101010101 11mo ago
Both "general" and "intelligence" are _at least_ easily arguable without moving any goal posts, not that goal posts have ever been well established in the first place.
21.
by 010101010101 11mo ago
Where are you because it’s sure not where I am…
22.
by 010101010101 1y ago
This makes for a pithy sound bite, but that’s pretty much only possible if you’re independently wealthy to the point of being in the “fuck you money” category of wealth. There’s no part of expecting people to hand you money that doesn’t ob
23.
by 010101010101 1y ago
The curly braces with the arrow pointing down are the thing implying the recursive calls on that set of elements until you’re done.
24.
by 010101010101 1y ago
Surely the Venn diagram needs not be a circle for you to draw parallels, nor does the existence of a more direct comparison make other comparisons moot.
25.
by 010101010101 1y ago
That’s _definitely not_ the entire point of the show.
26.
by 010101010101 1y ago
I get the sentiment and it’s a wise warning that at some point most people in grey hat spaces end up adhering to, but “do exactly as you’re allowed to do by large corporations” isn’t exactly a hacker ethos.
27.
by 010101010101 1y ago
I would try to computer history museum in Mountain View - they don’t accept everything, but if they want it it’d go to a super cool spot: https://computerhistory.org/acquisitions/
28.
by 010101010101 1y ago
Yesterday I used Warp’s LLM integrations to write two shell scripts that would have taken me longer to author myself than to do the task manually. Of the three options, this was the fastest by a wide margin. For this kind of low stakes, eas
29.
by 010101010101 1y ago
I had no idea, til, ty.
30.
by 010101010101 1y ago
Depends - sometimes with simple Jira boards, sometimes with other tools like Smartsheets or Air Table or a simple spreadsheet, sometimes with post-its and a white board, sometimes with no system formal or otherwise. My point is less about J

More ›