6 ms·
Good question -- I personally don't know of anyone else who is doing the whole "Open Salaries" thing. Does anyone else?
by stevenklein 11y ago
Good question -- I personally don't know of anyone else who is doing the whole "Open Salaries" thing. Does anyone else?
- mattoxbeckman 11y agoMaybe not in the same category, but the University of Illinois system has a site where you can look up anyone's salary.
- stevenklein 11y agoI think all universities might be required to publish employee salary but I might be wrong.
- irishcoffee 11y agoU of Md. College Park published all employee salaries every year. I always was entertained looking up bad profs. and seeing how much (or little) they made.
- irishcoffee 11y agoIronically, I think all government agencies have open pay scales and everyone knows exactly how much everyone else makes.
- makeitsuckless 11y agoHow is that "ironic"? Contrary to all anti-government rhetoric, most government agencies are by their nature more transparant than the average startup. However, it's easy to be transparant about salaries when you deal with collective bargaining and don't have to generate your own revenue. Especially the latter means that what companies are willing to pay tends to depend on the financial circumstances at the moment of hiring, resulting in differences that cannot be justified by performance or value. It takes costly rounds of corrections before you can be transparant about that without causing major upheaval when you reveal everyone's salaries. It only works for companies with short, relatively linear history. Everywhere else, salaries tend to diverge over time for many reasons.
- swombat 11y agoOpen pay scales are a start, but non-transparent salaries can easily hide in there if all you have is pay scales. You need two things for actual salary transparency: 1) Everyone's actual salary is accessible - as in, the actual amount they're paid each month, the transaction. This way everyone can know that there's nothing unfair hiding in there. 2) The reason why everyone's salary is what it is is transparent and accessible. Otherwise, the unfairness moves to how people are assigned to different salary bands. "John got assigned to Salary Band E3 because he plays golf with the boss" should not be a possible scenario. If it is, you don't have transparent salaries. Compensation isn't just made up of numbers, it's made up of explanations too.
- irishcoffee 11y ago1.) No, that's asinine. Look up the tax records of someone if you want to know that information. There are reasons people would want to keep their paycheck private, for very legitimate reasons. 2.) That first sentence doesn't make any sense. The second sentence is also asinine. You get on a pay band based on merit at work. If that isn't the case, or if you don't like politics at work, find a new job.. or realize there will always be politics at work. I'm not sure if you're a huge privacy advocate, but if you are, these ideas are a direct contradiction to privacy. Can't have my phone metadata, but if I can't see your pay stub life isn't fair.
- bcg1 11y agoI think this level of detail is pretty good, even though it doesn't have specific transactions necessarily: http://seethroughny.net/index.php?cID=375 http://seethroughny.net/index.php?cID=375 AFAIK this is compiled by a non-governmental organization however.
- swombat 11y agoMy company (GrantTree) does totally open salaries. AMA...