7 ms·
Mostly agreed about your meta point. I think you're omitting the possibility that someone might be opposed to something that benefits them. But in the non-meta
by pingswept 12y ago
Mostly agreed about your meta point. I think you're omitting the possibility that someone might be opposed to something that benefits them.
But in the non-meta discussion, all I'm saying is that you don't know which commenters are in which situation, and especially not with 95% certainty, like you claimed. Some of the commenters might oppose rent control, even though they benefit from it. Other commenters might strongly support rent control in San Francisco, even though they live in Wyoming. We just don't know.
- ghshephard 12y agoSo - I grant you that I don't have epistemological knowledge of these commentors positions. And yes, you're right, for people that don't have any skin in the game (people outside the bay area) - it's much more difficult to understand what their position is. I guess my only hope is that when people voice a very strong opinion on this topic (or, for that matter, any topic) - that they might consider whether they are holding that position with a "veil of ignorance", or whether they are just projecting from their own situation.
- pingswept 12y agoAgreed, good sir or madam!