It's a real dichotomy: The GP is replying to someone who said there should be no classified information, to which a proper refutation is to demonstrate the nee

It's a real dichotomy: The GP is replying to someone who said there should be no classified information, to which a proper refutation is to demonstrate the need for certain kinds of classified information. Two comments above that, someone was discussing whether or not this particular instance was some of the information that should be classified, followed by the claim that there should be none, and then the GPs refutation. Your comment is wrong, and adds nothing to the discussion.