7 ms·
Sold. Now we just need to get 7.2 billion minus 2 people on-board.
by dsirijus 12y ago
Sold.
Now we just need to get 7.2 billion minus 2 people on-board.
- lucb1e 12y agoI think pretty much everyone here would agree. It's common convention that we need to change. I'm Dutch and trying to push for YYYY-MM-DD because it's the only format that makes sense when sorting. Classmates have a lot of trouble with it and still put "Notes 18-10.docx" in a directory full of "Notes 2014-10-18.odt"-like files. Though I would be pretty fine with DD-MM-YYYY, at least be consistent... The only format that I really object to is the American MM/DD/YYYY format.
- oftenwrong 12y agoDD-MM-YYYY -> "19th of October" MM/DD/YYYY -> "October 19th" Americans typically would say the latter, so it is consistent in that sense.
- alkonaut 12y agoSo the format comes from how it is read? That sounds plausible. "October 19th, 2014". I'd pronounce a date like "day, month, year" but always format it yyyy-mm-dd, it never struck me that a date format (abbreviation) should be possible to pronounce without first parsing it completely. It does make sense, I just never thought about it. A reasonable (i.e. sortable) date format is 2014/10/19 but that would make sense in spoken form only as "2014, October 19th" which doesn't sound quite right. A sidenote: in northern europe (Germany, Sweden etc.) we do it wrong on addresses: [Street, Number, PostalCode, City/Region, Country]. Going from smallest to largest context is actually done correctly in english [Number, Street, PostalCode, City/Region, Country]. You can sort addresses lexically!