6 ms·

Cute? Personally, I think it is fugly.

by akumen 12y ago

cliveowen 12y ago
Agreed, and that enormous thing on the roof just shouldn't be there. "Google plans to build 100 to 200 of these prototypes, and work towards safety approval by the end of the year. The future’s coming a lot faster than we thought." If this is the future I hope there will be time travel, so I can go back.
- swalsh 12y ago
  Seriously, your big problem with self driving cars is you think a giant laser on top is ugly?
  - iagooar 12y ago
    I can kind of understand that. Cars are not only a motor on 4 wheels. Design is one of the most important aspects when man building and selling cars, so it is not strange that people think of the camera as something that doesn't fit. Until Tesla came and showed an electrical car that actually DID attract car / driving fans, the majority of people wouldn't consider an electrical car because most of them were plain ugly, even if the technology underneath was plain neat. Same thing with self driving cars. I know it's not top priority for now, but I think the real breakthrough will be achieved by a completely redesigned and appealing car.
    - zanny 12y ago
      > I think the real breakthrough will be achieved by a completely redesigned and appealing car. Hopefully, on a Tesla. Tesla range and safety design + self driving. I'd pay six figures for that.
    - afarrell 12y ago
      But part of the point of Tesla is that lots of hobbyists and researchers and failed companies already did the work for proving that electric cars are feasible on a basic level. They could take that work and on top of it build cars that are beautiful and have refined engineering. Aside from the DARPA challenge in the desert, Google has had to start from square 1, so it needs to accept that it will build ugly cars first.
- prawn 12y ago
  Does the signalling and branding on top of current taxis have you turn to your time travel device rather than just get inside and give the driver your destination?
annnnd 12y ago
Agreed, but the point here is that it makes people more trusting towards it. I am guessing that if it looked more sleek (think: Ferrari) people would be more scared of getting in the vehicle. Big eyes, round shapes, smile without teeth... it doesn't look dangerous at all. That was also one of the points of this article (as I understood it). I wonder how would it look if Apple made one too? I am sure it would be much more stylish.

Cute? Personally, I think it is fugly.

by akumen 12y ago

Cute? Personally, I think it is fugly.

Agreed, and that enormous thing on the roof just shouldn't be there. "Google plans to build 100 to 200 of these prototypes, and work towards safety approval by the end of the year. The future’s coming a lot faster than we thought." If this is the future I hope there will be time travel, so I can go back.

swalsh 12y ago
Seriously, your big problem with self driving cars is you think a giant laser on top is ugly?
- iagooar 12y ago
  I can kind of understand that. Cars are not only a motor on 4 wheels. Design is one of the most important aspects when man building and selling cars, so it is not strange that people think of the camera as something that doesn't fit. Until Tesla came and showed an electrical car that actually DID attract car / driving fans, the majority of people wouldn't consider an electrical car because most of them were plain ugly, even if the technology underneath was plain neat. Same thing with self driving cars. I know it's not top priority for now, but I think the real breakthrough will be achieved by a completely redesigned and appealing car.
  - zanny 12y ago
    > I think the real breakthrough will be achieved by a completely redesigned and appealing car. Hopefully, on a Tesla. Tesla range and safety design + self driving. I'd pay six figures for that.
  - afarrell 12y ago
    But part of the point of Tesla is that lots of hobbyists and researchers and failed companies already did the work for proving that electric cars are feasible on a basic level. They could take that work and on top of it build cars that are beautiful and have refined engineering. Aside from the DARPA challenge in the desert, Google has had to start from square 1, so it needs to accept that it will build ugly cars first.
prawn 12y ago
Does the signalling and branding on top of current taxis have you turn to your time travel device rather than just get inside and give the driver your destination?

annnnd 12y ago

Agreed, but the point here is that it makes people more trusting towards it. I am guessing that if it looked more sleek (think: Ferrari) people would be more scared of getting in the vehicle. Big eyes, round shapes, smile without teeth... it doesn't look dangerous at all. That was also one of the points of this article (as I understood it). I wonder how would it look if Apple made one too? I am sure it would be much more stylish.