5 ms·

Yeah – what post?

• rootlocus 12y ago
  "Class that copies stdin to stdout, as compained about as not being cleanly writable in Java on Hacker News." That post, maybe?
• eshyong 12y ago
  "Why I like Java" by Mark Dominus: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7463671 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7463671
  • acqq 12y ago
    Who never wrote it but assumed we know that the same program in Perl, without using command line switches is while (<>) { print; } Still Awk is shorter: { print } And if you are allowed change the switches of the command line to Perl for your program that Perl program can have exactly 0 bytes.
    • patio11 12y ago
      Awk is even shorter: anything truthy works. You don't even need the print statement or brackets. Thus there are nine separate 1-byte programs which produce cat: [1], [2], [3], etc etc. By default, unless you use the BEGIN block or something, awk will run your program on each line of stdlin. This is useful for programs of the type: (/some regular expression/) { some action} The default action if you don't specify one is "print $0" (the whole matching line). If your condition is a plain-ol' expression rather than a regular expression, and it always evaluates truthy, you thus get every line.
      • acqq 12y ago
        You are right, the shortest awk is one byte. Please post the link all nine variants I wasn't able to Google it. Still the shortest Perl is 0 bytes when the command line switch is allowed to be -p Update: That's actually called "the sed mode of Perl." Moreover these two command lines behave similarly: perl -pe 's/search/replace/g' and sed 's/search/replace/'
        • dvdkhlng 12y ago
          SED is shorter (0 byte). SED /is/ a turing complete language [1] so don't try to claim that I'm cheating. sed < input > output :) [1] http://robertkotcher.com/sed.html http://robertkotcher.com/sed.html [update] s/set/sed/
          • deleted 12y ago
            [deleted]
          • acqq 12y ago
            The command line equivalent, with Perl: perl -pe '' <input >output
          • Alphasite_ 12y ago
            Even java can do that setOut(system.in); (iirc)
            • dvdkhlng 12y ago
              > Even java can do that setOut(system.in); I was referring to an empty SED-program that would then be run via 'sed -f empty-file.sed'. Of course you need >0 bytes to invoke the SED program.
    • RyanZAG 12y ago
      Sure, but if you want to modify this code to send stdin over the network or through bluetooth in the Java version, you would just replace 'System.out' with the socket. The code would remain the same - in fact the whole class could be reused by having it pass in an input and output stream as parameters. Your example is very much just a special shortcut for one special condition. It's not generalizable in the same way. And let's be honest - most of today's code is not writing to standard output, it is writing to some iOS or Android GUI or outputting JSON to be used in some javascript webapp. That kind of shortcut just doesn't make sense anymore and is a relic of a different time.
      • acqq 12y ago
        In Linux you can redirect the stdout to the the socket outside of your program, no programming required. You can test and develop everything with stdout and let the same unmodified file run in the web server. See traditional CGI, that's how dynamically generated web pages were easiest to implement long ago: http://computer.howstuffworks.com/cgi3.htm http://computer.howstuffworks.com/cgi3.htm The server opens the socket, redirects the stdout to his socket while calling your program fully unmodified.
        • RyanZAG 12y ago
          You open network sockets in Linux and redirect stdout to them? It's possible with curl I guess, but generally people don't do that as it's hard to send the data in the right format. Mostly people will use a tool to access network services. As for serving files, you'd normally let nginx or apache take care of the sockets for you and not use output redirection. In Plan9 it's actually viable to use network sockets as files which is pretty nice, but for Linux it's not really how people do it.
          • acqq 12y ago
            > but for Linux it's not really how people do it. Please explain that to all the people who wrote CGI scripts for years. Seen the link at all?
    • sadfnjksdf 12y ago
      grep is even shorter: grep $ That reads lines from stdin and echoes to stdout.
      • dvdkhlng 12y ago
        Grep expressions are not a turing-complete language, so I guess that won't count. You could claim that you solved the task using a shell script (that invoked the grep "function") but if you programmed in shell, the shortest solution AFAICS is #!/bin/sh cat
    • blossoms 12y ago
      That mangles binary data. $ printf 'binarydata'|awk '{ print }'|hexdump -C 00000000 62 69 6e 61 72 79 64 61 74 61 0a |binarydata.| 0000000b
    • deleted 12y ago
      [deleted]