8 ms·
New Amazon EC2 GPU Instance Type
- dsugarman 13y agothis is huge beyond graphics, new levels of performance can be achieved with GPGPU for data intensive startups. i would love to see someone build a company around this.
- jeffbarr 13y agoThere's more technical info in my post at http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2013/11/build-3d-streaming-applications-with-ec2s-new-g2-instance-type.html http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2013/11/build-3d-streaming-applic...
- lelf 13y agohttp://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/using_cluster_computing.html http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/using_clu...
- HeXetic 13y ago> making it ideally suited for video creation services, 3D visualizations, streaming graphics-intensive applications ... And, presumably, cracking hashes!
- earlz 13y agoI've never used Amazon EC2, but with this kind of application, I might have to give it a try. Buying a $300 graphics card just to try some GPU programming is ridiculous.
- profquail 13y agoYou don't need to buy a $300 graphics card to experiment with GPU programming. The current and previous generation Intel CPUs (Haswell and Ivy Bridge, respectively) have on-die GPUs which support OpenCL: http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-sdk-for-opencl-applications-2013-release-notes http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-sdk-for-openc... AMD's APUs are quite cheap (~$100) CPU+GPU designs similar to those in the upcoming PS4 and XBox One (though the retail APUs are somewhat less powerful). They've been more-or-less designed specifically around the needs of a heterogenous OpenCL application. Finally, the last several generations of NVidia cards all support both CUDA and OpenCL; the newer cards do support additional features though. You should be able to pick up a low-end, recent-edition Nvidia GPU for roughly $100. The new g2.2xlarge instances are $0.650/hour, and the existing cg1.4xlarge are $2.100/hour; so it may make sense to experiment on AWS a bit, then buy your own card for long-term use if you decide to spend more time doing GPU programming.
- idupree 13y agoSadly, Intel's integrated-GPU OpenCL still doesn't support Linux, and only just started supporting OS X in 10.9 Mavericks[1]. Usually Intel's Linux GPU support is great; I don't know why this is different. (Intel do have a Linux OpenCL implementation for Xeon CPU cores and Xeon Phi coprocessor[2], which doesn't help me much. On-CPU OpenCL is fine but hardly faster than regular CPU code, and Phi coprocessors aren't very common currently.) [1] http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1620203 http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1620203 [2] http://software.intel.com/en-us/vcsource/tools/opencl http://software.intel.com/en-us/vcsource/tools/opencl
- oakwhiz 13y agoI take it that you don't play video games on your desktop machine, then.
- ck2 13y agoVery weird they do not use the amazon domain for that and yet it looks exactly like amazon. Teaching consumers bad habits.
- fintler 13y agoIt appears to be a service hosted by Thomson Reuters: http://corporatesolutions.thomsonreuters.com/investor-relations-ipo/communication-solutions/websites/ http://corporatesolutions.thomsonreuters.com/investor-relati... Many more examples (including several large companies) can be found at: https://www.google.com/search?q=inurl:http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml+inurl:p%3Dirol-irhome+site:phx.corporate-ir.net https://www.google.com/search?q=inurl:http://phx.corporate-i...
- fletchowns 13y agoI particularly like how http://phx.corporate-ir.net/ http://phx.corporate-ir.net/ does a 302 to http://www.ccbn.com/ http://www.ccbn.com/ which doesn't even go anywhere.
- derefr 13y agoI saw the previous developer of the CCBN (Corporate Communications Broadcast Network) pop up on in the HN comments last time this was mentioned to explain its stagnation and mishandling after being bought by Thomson-Reuters. Can't find it now myself; anyone else have the link?
- smackfu 13y agoThis one? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5787892 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5787892 Interestingly, it seems like they recently sold it to NASDAQ: http://corporatesolutions.thomsonreuters.com/investor-relations-ipo/ http://corporatesolutions.thomsonreuters.com/investor-relati...
- jeffbarr 13y agoThat's a really good point, and one that I will be bringing up with my manager immediately after re:Invent (I am part of the AWS team).
- thenomad 13y agoHow do the GPUs on this compare with NVidia desktop GPUs? Anyone know? Also, very exciting that they're supporting GPU cloud rendering - that's going to be big for 3D.
- wmf 13y agoVia Jeff Barr: NVIDIA GRID™ (GK104 "Kepler") GPU (Graphics Processing Unit), 1,536 CUDA cores and 4 GB of video (frame buffer) RAM.
- thenomad 13y agoThanks! My experience is that graphics card stats are a decidedly slippery fish as far as comparison goes. However, a quick bit of Googling implies that this is almost identical, at least on paper, to a GeForce 770 or 680. http://www.geforce.co.uk/whats-new/articles/introducing-the-geforce-gtx-770 http://www.geforce.co.uk/whats-new/articles/introducing-the-... Unfortunately, without knowing more details (clock speed, memory bandwidth) it's hard to say more. Guess someone (possibly me) needs to benchmark 'em. :) UPDATE - excellent info further down this thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6678744 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6678744
- warrenmiller 13y agoAn ideas whether this would make a decent bitcoin miner?
- varelse 13y agoI'd guess it'd hit about ~75% of a GTX 680 at this task.
- thenomad 13y agoWhat makes you think that? Specs look pretty similar to a 680.
- dmm 13y agoThe bitcoin network difficulty is rising so fast that even the first-gen ASICs are becoming obsolete. For example if you have a good Radeon HD7970, you can get about .8 GH/s. Based on the rate of difficulty increase the 7970 would mine about 0.02 BTC in all of November 2013 and 0.01 BTC in December 2013 and < 0.01/month after that. For various reasons Nvidia cards are slower at BTC mining than AMD. The fastest Nvidia card, the Tesla S2070, can only hash about 0.750 GH/s. Even 60GH/s ASIC miners will be earning < 0.10 BTC per month by March 2014. In August 2013 a 60GH/s miner would make ~0.8 BTC PER DAY. That's how quickly the difficulty is increasing. At this point no GPU would make a decent bitcoin miner, except as a hobby.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- kayoone 13y agoWith stuff like this it looks like the devices we use could be only streaming clients in the future and wont require a lot of processing power but excellent network connectivity. That goes a bit against the trend in web development to move much of the processing to the client side so i wonder where this will go. Really high performance streaming of apps/games could revert the trend of making everything browser based in favor of streamed native apps.
- dsugarman 13y agocan they preload http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PGStrom http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PGStrom?
- jewel 13y agoI work on some opengl software that renders slideshows, and this is precisely what we need. We've used the bigger CG1.4xlarge nodes in the past but they are very expensive for what we're doing. The lower price on this (65¢/hr instead of $2.40) is going to be much more manageable for us.
- jeffbarr 13y agoSounds awesome. Send me a link when you have it working!
- beamatronic 13y agoI'm trying Folding@Home on it now. Looks like it might not recognize the GPU. 22:42:58:WU02:FS00:0x15:GPU memtest failure 22:42:58:WU02:FS00:0x15: 22:42:58:WU02:FS00:0x15:Folding@home Core Shutdown: GPU_MEMTEST_ERROR 22:42:58:WU02:FS00:0x15:Starting GUI Server 22:42:59:WARNING:WU02:FS00:FahCore returned: GPU_MEMTEST_ERROR (124 = 0x7c)
- jeffbarr 13y agoIf you are confident that this should be working, post a note to the EC2 forum so that we can investigate.