>It seems like you are saying that is there is indeed a real conspiracy of institutions created and/or controlled by men, in which case I totally agree. It see

>It seems like you are saying that is there is indeed a real conspiracy of institutions created and/or controlled by men, in which case I totally agree. It seems like you are deliberately choosing to respond with non-sequiturs and strawmen because you don't want to have an honest conversation. >I've yet to see convincing alternative explanations. All of the evidence points to existence of patriarchy as a social institution. Just as creationists view all evidence as pointing to the existence of god. If you start with a conclusion, and twist everything to suit that end, you can't reasonably expect people who didn't start with the same bias to agree with your conclusions.