5 ms·
There was some novel where I read NSA has their own resident tough guys. was that pure fiction?
by fakeer 13y ago
There was some novel where I read NSA has their own resident tough guys. was that pure fiction?
- rdl 13y agoThere are plenty of military assigned to NSA, to do things like operate SIGINT aircraft, or handle key distribution to the military on the COMSEC side. NSA doesn't do much field intelligence stuff; it's mainly radio/etc. intercepts on military bases, aircraft, ships, etc. Their regular site security is either military or contracted out to Wackenhut or other private security companies, after all (which is apparently what one of Snowden's early jobs was). The real tough guys of the signals world are the Army's ISA, who do tactical sigint and killing, all in one. I'm sure ISA and NSA cooperate a lot. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_Support_Activity http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_Support_Activity They're the guys who caught Pablo Escobar. Essentially the most secretive of the tier-1 JSOC units. IMO, the world's most awesome job for a bofh sysadmin -- you get to listen in to enemy communications, and use their improper security procedures to find them, and then punish them (by killing them).
- dfc 13y agoThe real ____ guys of the... You can fill in that blank with just about any superlative and it fits. My dream job would be to work for the secret army of northern virginia.
- rl3 13y agoUbisoft dropped Michael Ironside from the Splinter Cell franchise, so I'm pretty sure NSA has no tough guys left now.
- wisty 13y agoProbably fiction. The NSA might use its black budget to fund tough guys (paying the payroll and overhead), but they'd probably be trained and managed by the CIA and / or military, as part of some joint operation. It's very common for public officials to get too much money, and not be able to spend it. So they find another agency which wants the money, and organise some kind of joint operation. It keeps their spending nice and robust (so the bean counters don't realise they don't need all that money), and the other side gets the resources they need. It's win-win (for everyone but the taxpayers).