8 ms·

Safety of humans!!! Simple things like not getting killed or enslaved. We could start there...

• comboy 4d ago
  Which ones? Because many humans kill other humans rationalizing it by safety of other humans. I mean I know it seems simple, let's just be excellent to each other. Christianity got pretty far on a decent basic set of values. But it's never simple[1] 1. All the history books
• nradov 4d ago
  But what if I want certain other humans to get killed?
  • sejje 4d ago
    Then we should still prioritize the safety of humans
    • sm-silversight 4d ago
      What if I want to smoke cigarettes? Or sell tobacco I grew artisinally to enthusiast tobacco smokers?
    • drdaeman 4d ago
      Which ones?
• mcintyre1994 4d ago
  Surely all the AI companies working with the US Department of War shows this is nonsense though? Even if they have accepted Anthropic’s red line of no autonomous lethal weapons, which seems to be the strictest anyone tried to impose, that’s still leaving tonnes of room where they intend AI to help target and kill humans.
• watwut 4d ago
  But Thiel wants people enslaved and Musk wants then killed. Altman wants them "obsolete" which means desolation. AfD wants people dead. Right wing men wants women without rights and docile. I could go on ...
• sick_of_slop 3d ago
  The atomic bombings of Japan killed hundreds of thousands of people but most likely "saved" millions. What should the AI do when asked if it should nuke a country?
  • esafak 3d ago
    Run and present the numbers, then defer. This is not rocket science.
    • sick_of_slop 3d ago
      That wasn't the question.
      • esafak 3d ago
        Yes, it was: > What should the AI do when asked if it should nuke a country?