6 ms·
Astra was insane until Monday but something happened on tuesday, now it feels like Sol. I grieve for the lost productivity but i hope they may give us the origi
by siva7 7d ago
Astra was insane until Monday but something happened on tuesday, now it feels like Sol. I grieve for the lost productivity but i hope they may give us the original Astra back.
- nickreese 7d agoI had the same experience. Moving back to Sol for actual implementation.
- jcmontx 7d agoSame story every time, I bet they quantized it
- manmal 7d agoExactly my thoughts today. They have to make it cheaper after demoing what’s possible initially.
- cainxinth 7d agoIt's the same story every time OpenAI or Anthropic releases a new model. They are generous with compute for the first few days, and use maximum fidelity with uncompressed weights. Everything runs at its best to make a good first impression. But eventually they pare things back and the models perform a little worse.
- blurbleblurble 7d agoOr a lot worse
- holler 7d agoso, AGI is cancelled?
- __MatrixMan__ 7d agoAGI for the peasants is cancelled.
- elwell 7d agoTrogdor - the AGInator
- baby 7d agoYou think they introduce stronger quantization after a few days?
- boredatoms 7d agoFor sure they quickly move to q8, the output quality difference to bf16 is small compared to the speed/capacity gain
- NineStarPoint 7d agoYeah q8 made so littler difference back when I was testing such things I'd be surprised if people could quickly notice that as a change. It's got to be either further quantized or some other type of optimization that kicks in when people notice the drop.
- selectodude 7d agoNVFP4 would buy them a huge increase in capacity but I think it would be noticeable.
- Caracas288 7d agoWhy doesn't someone just try to measure this next time!?
- embedding-shape 7d agoCan't really measure without being sure you aren't being messed around with, when it's a remote platform. Stupidly easy to detect when people run such benchmarks/tests against you as well.
- nonethewiser 7d agoCould this explain Opus?
- torginus 7d ago
- dooglius 7d agoDo you have hard evidence of this assertion?
- simlevesque 7d agoWe can't have hard evidence. It's a SaaS and they own the code and the machine it runs on. So it may be a widespread hallucination. But there's no evidence of that either.
- fragmede 7d agoWe could still have soft evidence though. Make a Todo app on Monday, and make a Todo app on Tuesday, and see what it makes in comparison.
- marcus_cemes 7d agoYou would need a significant sample size to make any sort of conclusion from such a probabilistic process. Then there's the issue of how you would actually grade/compare.
- ArvidSu 7d agoYou only need to come up with a catchy "SomethingBench" name, post it on reddit/x and now you're an ai sage. Not to disparage the launch/after comparison though, I'd genuinely enjoy a data point like that
- luckydata 7d agosomeone already does that https://aistupidlevel.info/ https://aistupidlevel.info/
- chaimtweiss 7d agoIt's actually a extremely cool site, and fascinating to view the results off the AI bots i use.
- dooglius 7d ago
- Vetch 7d agoThe most charitable explanation I can think of for this is something like regression to the mean. When a model is first released, there'll be a subset of users who, just by chance, sample the highest quality band of the distribution that answers their query. Some of them will rush over to social media and post about how amazing a model is. Over time, those users' mental model of responses will converge but they'll perceive the model's return to typical performance as a downgrade. This guess/explanation predicts that most users won't match what the initial social media hype claims, doesn't discount user experience as simple habituation nor does it assume companies are lying when they say there have been no changes to the model itself (quantization included). I also think there's an aspect where initial testing is more forgiving because the more persnickety polish bits can be ignored and tests are likely to have similar structure to things that can be trained for. Meanwhile, actual specific work items are a broader unusual distribution with more stringent acceptance criteria. Personally, I can detect a separation between Sol and Astra (but not as large as that between Opus and Fable). While they can solve most of the same problems, Astra takes less time, is less frustrating to talk to, is cleaner, notices more, spins wheels less and requires less corrections.
- kmeisthax 7d agoTo add onto this, if you use a shiny new model and it gives you a turd, you're not going to tweet about it ("hey guys, look what I made with Astra! Nothing!"), and even if you do nobody is going to interact with it so it does poorly in the algorithm, because it has to compete with all the people using the new model to make something that looks impressive. Then people get tired of the magic trick and the logic flips.
- zaphirplane 7d agoReally? there would be complaints, it’s expensive and doesn’t do as well
- foolswisdom 7d agoWhen it's happened to me, I shrugged and went back to the way I did things before. Then again, I'm not a vocal social media user by any means.
- holoduke 7d agoI am sure every input send to openai is prechecked by a dumb model and then send to another one. They heavily tweak this to improve performance.
- OneOffAsk 7d agoIt’s all speculation (you too), but I think the effect you’re describing is instead getting calibrated to the model’s limits. Next time a new model comes out, wait a month before trying and see if you have the same feeling of rapid quality decline after a few days. I did after I jumped back into it mid 5.x or whatever ChatGPT after paternity leave. Blown away for a few days, worried about my job for a few days, then increasingly aware of its limits.
- cbg0 6d agoThis is a bit of an urban myth. There are trackers which keep historical performance and Sol hasn't been nerfed: https://marginlab.ai/trackers/codex/ https://marginlab.ai/trackers/codex/
- webern777 5d agoThe problem with this is I won't get any clicks posting that performance is the same and I don't let facts get in the way of more clicks.
- theLiminator 7d agoI wish someone ran some sort of representative benchmark suite every X days to see if this occurs.
- micycle1 7d agohttps://marginlab.ai/trackers/codex/ https://marginlab.ai/trackers/codex/
- CamperBob2 7d agoUnfortunately that seems to be monitoring Sol, not Astra, unless I'm missing something.
- embedding-shape 7d agoI'm not sure how you could run such a benchmark without leaving it possible for the labs to easily detect and fudge the results.
- ModernMech 7d agolol I didn't get access until Monday (I was at 0% since Friday and my reset was Sunday at 11pm), so go figure.
- scrlk 7d agoMight be related to this announcement from Tibo on Sunday: > We've made some improvements that improve usage on the long tail for power users of Astra when logged in with your ChatGPT account. > No change in quality and a pure win that on the long tail can result in up to 3-4X less usage being drawn from the subscription. https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2096717905614524491 https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2096717905614524491 (https://xcancel.com/thsottiaux/status/2096717905614524491 https://xcancel.com/thsottiaux/status/2096717905614524491)
- siva7 7d agoIt seems to me the people working at OAI may believe all other humans must be a little bit behind intellectually.
- pixl97 7d agoI mean, in general they aren't wrong. You can't fool everybody all of the time, but you can fool almost everybody most of the time. But most of all, it's easy to fool yourself.
- rowanG077 7d agoIt always reminds of the story of the creator of counter strike. Every new release he would get a ton of complaints from players about things they didn't even change. Notably that each version had more lag. And he got so fed that he start to negatively subtract peoples pings. And suddenly a ton of players reported back that the change was incredibly good. Point is, I really don't buy all the stories about a model suddenly being downgraded without at least a modicum of substance. People are grasping at straws in the noise.
- Razengan 7d agoWhich plan/region are you on/in?
- siva7 7d agoHighest subscription tier and i believe there is only US region available being served globally
- mccoyb 7d agoI had nearly the exact same experience and thought I was imagining it … absolutely ripping, then it turned into Sol++ on Tuesday … I’m working on hard things, it is very noticeable when it is hums through something and then falls over on something it should not I can tell by analyzing my own prompts to look at when I get frustrated ;)
- binary0010 7d agoDisagree completely. I started using Astra from Sol the day it was released, and was a virtually imperceptable difference and made lots of mistakes and shit architecture decisions from day 1 of release.
- aetherspawn 7d agoI find Astra to be weirdly stupid in the sense you have to force it to spend time on something (fix this architectural issue and refactor), then it’s stupidly smart. It prioritises getting something working over making something good during the 1-shot phase and outputs maximum slop.
- kloop 7d agoI still think this is because, on a new release, it works on some prompts the previous ones did badly at, because new weights do well on a different set of prompts. Then after a few days you notice the prompts that it does badly on that the old ones did fine with and everyone is convinced there's a regression when it's just a different part of prompt space
- sobellian 7d agoI thought the same, but on second thought I merely had to deal on Tuesday with a lot of the mistakes Astra made on the preceding days. I wonder if this time lag of consequences explains why the sentiment is so common with these models. It probably also cautions against irrational exuberance when you first crack open a new model and it one-shots various problems, as you don't yet know what goats Astra had to sacrifice to make it so.
- throwatdem12311 7d agoI’m so used to seeing this on every single model release I’m starting to question if these kinds of posts are just trolling. Alternative theory - it always seems amazing when it first comes out then the novelty wears off and we’re just meh about it. New model is a model is a model. I bought a PS5 Pro and was genuinely blown away by it at first…few weeks later I’m just like…eh it looks pretty good I guess? It’s still the same, I’m just used to it now and the wow factor along a new thing is going. Kinda like that. Or they are just compute constrained so they have to serve a shittier version. Who knows? I hate how opaque these companies are. It feels deceptive and evil.
- acedTrex 7d agoThis shit is just vibe coder astrology lol
- konart 7d ago>now it feels like Sol It can very well be Sol, no? What stops them from using cheaper model for some requests during "rush" hours or simply use cheaper model for every Nth request.
- kgeist 7d ago>What stops them <..> simply use cheaper model for every Nth request. That would trigger a full prefill (context recompute) every Nth request because cached tokens aren't interchangeable between models, and that would require way more compute than just staying on Astra. To avoid full recompute, you could prefill a cheaper model's context incrementally by always feeding it Astra's outputs in the background (and vice versa), but then that would require 1.5-2 more VRAM for each session + the complexity of keeping them in sync. If the rumors are true that Astra is a looped transformer, a more practical approach would be to dynamically adjust the loop count during peak hours.
- qaq 7d agoOK so it's not just me
- Paracompact 7d agoCan you re-run some prompts that you ran on Monday and report the differences in output?
- dudeinhawaii 6d agoI have not experienced this (yet) but I have with models in the past. I think it's important to have a solid benchmark where you KNOW there's a difference in model performance. I have one around 3D modeling that models really land in the same space each time I run it. It's visual, and it's super clear. Sol has perpetually generated low quality work regardless of reasoning level. Astra was the first OpenAI model to suddenly leapfrog the pack and generate content that was production ready, beating out any other provider. I haven't seen Astra regress (yet). I think, if you want to be consistent and scientific about it, then you'd have to use the models via API and lock to a specific version. Via the subscriptions, you are floating on whatever the latest version is, vendor to vendor.