8 ms·
but a very large part of the whole model was trained on work in a manner the authors didn't consent to, the "for research purposes only" datasets of the entire
by tripzilch 8d ago
but a very large part of the whole model was trained on work in a manner the authors didn't consent to, the "for research purposes only" datasets of the entire Internet, etc
and you can argue this is "fair use" or whatever, not the point now, the point is that it definitely makes those accusations no longer "baseless".
in addition, it is not given freely to the world, it is the knowledge of the Internet/WWW being sold back to you as a subscription service. it's not free. and it's not even "given", because they can (technically) turn off the tap at any moment and you don't have it any more.
- KoolKat23 7d agoHumans do this all the time. You watch a YouTube video and subconsciously choose the same colour palette. They hear a rumour that it's a solved problem, i.e. they were pointed in the right direction that is all. I mean some companies glean insight into new products merely by asking other people what they do for a living. People need to get over this ownership thing, it's being taken too far. Humans benefit from the efforts of others simple as that.