7 ms·
Questioning his finances is a poor argument because he clearly would have more money if he had stayed at Anthropic for the next couple of years, than he will ha
by frabcus 9d ago
Questioning his finances is a poor argument because he clearly would have more money if he had stayed at Anthropic for the next couple of years, than he will have by leaving. Even if he still has vested options, or savings from his salary or whatever, those would be larger if he stayed.
- gizmodo59 8d agoThe fame he got, the stamp of a frontier lab in the resume - its worth more than working in many other companies for years. Plus, not everyone thinks working more is needed once they achieve a certain number.
- ungovernableCat 9d agoI think it’s a valid question to ask if he quit the company for moral reasons. If you seriously think the frontier labs are dangerously playing with everyone’s lives (how many companies can even claim this civilisational scale) then why would you be ok with holding vested shares which will grow in value if the corporation achieves what it aims to achieve? At the very least you can sell them (they’re not so illiquid considering the company’s hype and success) and invest in the broad market.
- stonogo 9d agoUnless, of course, he starts working for a competitor at a higher salary. I'm sure whoever is paying him will be free of the ethical concerns he here expressed.
- sillyfluke 8d ago> clearly Debatable, and clearly not clear. It's weird to say this when there are obvious counter examples staring us in the face, not least of all the founder of the company he just left, of who (Dario) people could have said the same thing when he left OpenAI. Granted, there is less likelihood now then there was then but this much is clear: if he starts his own company, he may make more.