5 ms·
It’s also been baked into Codex. Go figure
by piker 8d ago
It’s also been baked into Codex. Go figure
- thenewnewguy 8d agoIt's open source software - it can be baked into pretty much anything given they follow the license terms.
- user43928 8d agoThe question is whether the 10 million active users of Codex / ChatGPT Work count towards the download count. That would contradict the cause implied in the title here.
- jkahrs595 8d agoExplains the download records as well
- jdiff 8d agoNot really. One entity embedding the software into another will only account for at most a handful of downloads.
- deleted 8d ago[deleted]
- empath75 8d agoI think it's not baked into codex, but codex has either been instructed to download it when asked to edit word docs/excel spreadsheets, or it picked it up during training.
- notatoad 8d agofrom the thread last week, it seems to be installed by default on every mac install, possibly not on windows installs. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49528079 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49528079
- notatoad 8d agoi think that's a perfectly coherent and reasonable way for both these apps to work. people don't want AI features leaking into their non-ai apps. I'm not an AI hater - I want my AI app to be able to read and write word docs, but when i decide to open up libreoffice i'm doing that because i want to write something myself, not use AI. i don't need my word processor to bundle an inferior version of what the ChatGPT can do for me.