6 ms·
I'm sorry to dismiss but this this is low quality. does anyone really believe this? > AI-generated faces and deepfakes are rated more trustworthy than human f
by simianwords 8d ago
I'm sorry to dismiss but this this is low quality.
does anyone really believe this?
> AI-generated faces and deepfakes are rated more trustworthy than human faces.
This is reddit tier slop science.
- someothherguyy 8d agohttps://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2120481119 https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2120481119 there is some very depressing research on this topic
- simianwords 8d ago[flagged]
- someothherguyy 8d ago> it is shocking to see that you have not even read the paper and you are just presenting it directly what the fuck do you know about what i have read? i was responding to a statement from the article. the link i shared is to an article that i read. it is cited some 600 times by similar articles. i don't have the time to analyze every thing that the president or his administration posts. i don't know the realness of the AI faces he posts. if you have a resource that summarizes this, feel free to share. maybe try to add to a discussion instead of ridiculing those participating in it with anecdotes and accusations.
- spenvo 8d agoHe isn't proclaiming that, he linked to this study https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1135087 https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1135087 led by Alexis McGuire with Paul Taylor and Sophie Nightingale from Lancaster University, Maty Bohacek from Stanford University and Hany Farid from the University of California, Berkeley - peer reviewed. Your comment lacks context.
- simianwords 8d ago[flagged]