6 ms·

So it’s a heuristic. Lots of very valuable heuristics exist.

• estearum 9d ago
  None of which is authoritative, per my initial comment.
• Tostino 9d ago
  And I'd agree if that's what GP said.
  • deleted 9d ago
    [deleted]
  • robotresearcher 9d ago
    What name do you use for an approach that probably gets a better than random success rate (without guaranteeing that)? I’m leaving out the ‘pseudo-scientific’ part of GP’s description, since it doesn’t entail anything technically.
    • Tostino 9d ago
      I was talking about the root comment that just said "it's AI because this website said so", not the one about treating it like a heuristic. I agree with that.