7 ms·
> How can you fuck up so monumentally, but then when Trump fires you somehow he’s the problem? They can both be a problem, it doesn’t have to be mutually exclu
by Frost1x 10d ago
> How can you fuck up so monumentally, but then when Trump fires you somehow he’s the problem?
They can both be a problem, it doesn’t have to be mutually exclusive. I’m sure in all the turnover Trump removed some incompetent people. He also probably removed quite a few competent people. The ratio is what matters.
- rayiner 10d agoThis isn’t a minor fuckup. It skewed House apportionment for a decade. Think of what would happen in the private sector: your team screws up something that blows up a major customer relationship. Do you think the firings are going to be surgical?
- grim_io 10d agoYes? This is neither Cesar's legion, nor The Apprentice. Although, the guy at the top sure runs his place like a TV show, where all the stuntmen really do die for real.
- ElProlactin 10d ago> Think of what would happen in the private sector: your team screws up something that blows up a major customer relationship. Do you think the firings are going to be surgical? Except that you can look at all of the firings the current administration has been behind and the pattern does not suggest that they are intended to remove people who were incompetent. To the contrary, the large number of reductions (and forced retirements) suggests that the administration is trying to remove political opponents and people who are "disloyal" to it, and to generally weaken institutions that the administration doesn't like or feels threatened by. This is especially visible in the military: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/military-leaders-fired-forced-out-resigned-hegseth-defense-secretary-trump-pentagon/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/military-leaders-fired-forced-o...
- aetch 10d agoYes, the government shouldn’t be run on emotions or like a for profit company