5 ms·
The paper certainly has its limitations. Only 61 participants, with almost nobody between 30 and 50, so we shouldn’t read the age trend as a decline across life
by petreradu 15d ago
The paper certainly has its limitations. Only 61 participants, with almost nobody between 30 and 50, so we shouldn’t read the age trend as a decline across lifespan. What’s more interesting than the title suggests (and I find the title forcing the conclusion a bit) is that the attention measures were not linked to age or the brain patterns at all.
Then again, i'm 45 and I've been losing my keys and my IDs since I was 20
- yborg 15d ago>I find the title forcing the conclusion a bit The entire article is AI-generated.I wish such sources would include the prompting used as well as the model so a (human) reader can better evaluate the document.
- mdp2021 15d ago> Reviewed by Patrisha Antonaros There is a responsible signer. If you think their method can be improved, write at https://studyfinds.com/contact/ https://studyfinds.com/contact/ They disclose an "AI policy" - https://studyfinds.com/ai-policy/ https://studyfinds.com/ai-policy/ > This process includes multiple checks using different LLM platforms, human editorial verification, and cross-referencing with original sources to ensure accuracy and eliminate false information, misleading content, fabricated content, bias, and unreasonable speculations or editorialization