7 ms·
cache all of them? no... but you could cache some of them, likely the newer are accessed more frequently.
by calvinmorrison 19d ago
cache all of them? no... but you could cache some of them, likely the newer are accessed more frequently.
- zbentley 19d agoPer the article, the vast majority of traffic is scrapers that are generating effectively random, permuted URLs. Even if they're already caching their popular-with-real-humans most recent data, that efficiency gain is a tiny drop in a very large bucket.
- desterothx 18d agoYes, and it still wouldnt help you since they are trying to fetch everything for each of the 921 forks, as stated in the article (same commits need to be cached again on a forked branch)