6 ms·

Standard API Pricing for GLM-5.3-Flash (per 1M tokens) - Input: $0.15 - Output: $0.50 - Cached input: $0.03

by iamsyr 24d ago

Xunjin 24d ago
Is that cheaper than DS4 flash?
- javier123454321 24d ago
  All I can say is that even if it is, I was almost glad to go back to using DS4 Flash. Because 0XAlpha was just so friggin slow to complete a task because of the level of circular reasoning that it would go over and over into, sometimes even returning no output. If I just wanted something done I would switch from a free model to a paid one which is crazy.
  - denysvitali 24d ago
    Tbh it was also slow because it was being hammered by everyone making use of the free tokens
    - javier123454321 24d ago
      Possibly influenced by that, but I believe that is a different issue. I meant the way it processed a request. It went into so many more loops of thinking.
- swiftcoder 24d ago
  It's even cheaper than DS4's off-peak pricing. Seems like DeepSeek have some stiff competition now
  - arizen 24d ago
    Few weeks ago, I wouldn't expect this statement to be true. Accelerate!
- nateb2022 24d ago
  Slightly more expensive than the (post-price hike) DS4 flash pricing, but in the ballpark. https://openrouter.ai/compare/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731/z-ai/glm-5.3-flash https://openrouter.ai/compare/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-073...
  - walrus01 24d ago
    Comparison should be to 0731
    - nateb2022 24d ago
      updated thanks
  - drob518 24d ago
    Hm. GLM is more expensive in all dimensions than DS but it has a lower weighted average input? How is that?? Something seems off. EDIT: Looks like they are swizzling around the pricing dynamically on that page, on both the GLM and the DS sides, so who knows.
    - desterothx 23d ago
      I mean, it implies that it has an even better cache hit rate that DS flash, which is impressive, as the chr on DS flash was already really good in my experience
      - nateb2022 23d ago
        I think the weighted average takes into account all providers (some DS4 flash providers are 'premium' providers and offering higher speeds for higher pricing) and these are tilting the scale
  - deleted 24d ago
    [deleted]

Standard API Pricing for GLM-5.3-Flash (per 1M tokens) - Input: $0.15 - Output: $0.50 - Cached input: $0.03

by iamsyr 24d ago

Standard API Pricing for GLM-5.3-Flash (per 1M tokens) - Input: $0.15 - Output: $0.50 - Cached input: $0.03

Xunjin 24d ago

Is that cheaper than DS4 flash?

javier123454321 24d ago
All I can say is that even if it is, I was almost glad to go back to using DS4 Flash. Because 0XAlpha was just so friggin slow to complete a task because of the level of circular reasoning that it would go over and over into, sometimes even returning no output. If I just wanted something done I would switch from a free model to a paid one which is crazy.
- denysvitali 24d ago
  Tbh it was also slow because it was being hammered by everyone making use of the free tokens
  - javier123454321 24d ago
    Possibly influenced by that, but I believe that is a different issue. I meant the way it processed a request. It went into so many more loops of thinking.
swiftcoder 24d ago
It's even cheaper than DS4's off-peak pricing. Seems like DeepSeek have some stiff competition now
- arizen 24d ago
  Few weeks ago, I wouldn't expect this statement to be true. Accelerate!
nateb2022 24d ago
Slightly more expensive than the (post-price hike) DS4 flash pricing, but in the ballpark. https://openrouter.ai/compare/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731/z-ai/glm-5.3-flash https://openrouter.ai/compare/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-073...
- walrus01 24d ago
  Comparison should be to 0731
  - nateb2022 24d ago
    updated thanks
- drob518 24d ago
  Hm. GLM is more expensive in all dimensions than DS but it has a lower weighted average input? How is that?? Something seems off. EDIT: Looks like they are swizzling around the pricing dynamically on that page, on both the GLM and the DS sides, so who knows.
  - desterothx 23d ago
    I mean, it implies that it has an even better cache hit rate that DS flash, which is impressive, as the chr on DS flash was already really good in my experience
    - nateb2022 23d ago
      I think the weighted average takes into account all providers (some DS4 flash providers are 'premium' providers and offering higher speeds for higher pricing) and these are tilting the scale
- deleted 24d ago
  [deleted]