5 ms·
To "They asked you because they wanted your take on it... Your context, your taste, your judgement." actually I'd ask even for more than that: For any given <s
by sebastianconcpt 27d ago
To "They asked you because they wanted your take on it... Your context, your taste, your judgement." actually I'd ask even for more than that:
For any given <subject> I'd want:
- Your context
- your taste
- your judgement
- clarify what bet <subject> encourages to support
- be ready to elaborate your thesis of that bet
With that we have the basic complete building block that used one after another can model a basic lifecycle of a dialogue that can make progress towards something (a goal, a mission, something useful)
- RIMR 27d agoIt sounds like you're approaching this narrowly for how you specifically communicate in your line of work, and not really thinking of the broader spectrum of how people communicate professionally. If people provided me the information you just listed, it wouldn't help me at all in what I do. Sometimes a customer emails asking a question answered by the documentation. I am not paid to paraphrase the documentation, I am paid to get customer requests out of the door quickly, so I'll be sending links to the documentation. If AI gets that request out of the way faster, good.
- sebastianconcpt 26d agoI see you point. You are helping them to connect dots and get unstuck. The case I've raised is actually generic and not specific to one domain. But you can say is scoped on how expert-to-expert can make progress. Or how "precision people" communicate because both agree they are putting hypothesis to the test and there will be one that is a winner (hence "the bet").