74 ms·
Yeah, it's obvious enough on its own, but I'll add that Pangram also thinks it's 100% fully AI generated. Hypocritical to say the least, given the message.
by Nition 1mo ago
Yeah, it's obvious enough on its own, but I'll add that Pangram also thinks it's 100% fully AI generated.
Hypocritical to say the least, given the message.
- sam_lowry_ 1mo agoPangram sucks
- deleted 1mo ago[deleted]
- Nition 1mo agoI've never seen a false positive from Pangram for human-written text of 300+ words.
- sam_lowry_ 29d agoPangram sucks by seeding fear.
- zbentley 29d agoSay more? I’ve found it quite useful and not a source of fear. It’s effective at calling out disrespect (human to human communication where one party stops participating as a human), and has been effective for me in writing my own communications more crisply and carefully
- sam_lowry_ 29d agoFear of being tagged as AI even if you write the text yourself. For me personally, it's fear to use – and —. I have my versions of XKB keyboard layouts that handily map these but I don't use them anymore. Nor do I use emoji, because some 18-6 months ago AU output abused emoji.
- zbentley 29d agoI honestly don’t think those are going to get you flagged as mostly-AI or with high confidence. On anything longer than a sentence I’ve found the false positive rate to be perfectly reasonable.
- rob 29d agoSeems like you have now? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49372618 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49372618
- no_multitudes 29d agoPeople sometimes tell lies on the internet. This is definitely AI-generated.
- RugnirViking 29d agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49377954 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49377954
- redsocksfan45 1mo ago[dead]
- deleted 29d ago[deleted]
- DonHopkins 29d agoPangram sucks as much as humans who think they're perfect llm generated text detectors, too. As qarl2 wrote below: >See how perverse this "I hate the way AI sounds" thing is? >In the end everyone accusing everyone of being AI. Which — as we all know — was trained on how humans write. If it's not one thing, it's another... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k59d-xMvooA&t=205s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k59d-xMvooA&t=205s
- no_multitudes 29d agoPlease give one example of a long-form verifiable non-adversarial pangram false positive (e.g., something written before 2022 that gives a result other than 100% human.)