5 ms·
What's the incentive to keep on improving the model beyond a point? 10 devs on a team will be cut to 2 devs, so that's 8 licenses lost. They have to increase th
by i_idiot 29d ago
What's the incentive to keep on improving the model beyond a point?
10 devs on a team will be cut to 2 devs, so that's 8 licenses lost. They have to increase the price many fold.
- rsoto2 29d agothey unironically think that they can replace everyone in an organization
- prerok 29d agoWhat I don't understand is, why not replace middle management, marketing, CTOs, CEOs and the like. Surely, LLMs are better at producing high quality looking slideware and vaporware than they are at producing software. Heavy sarcasm here if it's not obvious. Of course I know why.
- bulbar 28d agoI mean, there a so many startups getting crazy funding that run without management, or without engineers... or at least with so many less people than before.. except: not really. Is the whole "it's gonna replace people" even still on the table?
- prerok 28d agoI don't really understand what you mean... are you saying that the entire industry is parroting a fantasy that they all know is fake. So, everyone is faking to get more funds? Unfortunately, I don't think that's true.
- bulbar 27d agoYou think AI will replace a significant portion of the workforce in the sector? Do you see it already happening? I personally not. Lay offs are due to economic reasons, at least that's what I see. Why does Anthropic still had so many engineers? I got the impression companies are already moving back from their initial excitement. Many went all-in AI "more is better", that's not the case anymore. Why restricting usage, it's much cheaper than paying an engineer.