5 ms·
That's trivially solvable by deploying multiple AIs on one project, so that can't be the true obstacle.
by gowld 1mo ago
That's trivially solvable by deploying multiple AIs on one project, so that can't be the true obstacle.
- snaking0776 1mo agoI’m not so sure this is trivial and strongly depends on the biases of the agents that the group is composed of. It seems like some species of animals (humans, ants, wasps, etc) seem to select for intelligence in group settings more than individual intelligence. One of my favorite facts about human evolution is that in the process of becoming homo sapiens our brains actually shrunk relative to our ancestors possibly due to our reliance on social ties and specialization allowing for each individual unit to be “dumber” while the collective becomes more intelligent than any individual ever was. It’s not apparent to me that current LLM’s have the right biases for a trivial unit of “more LLM” = smarter. It seems apparent that LLM’s are under many metrics more “intelligent” than the average person but they still don’t rival our corporations or collectives in terms of intelligence and I don’t see them being plug in replacements for humans and maintaining the benefits of the collective structures yet. Not impossible but definitely not trivial in my mind. We and our cultures evolved to work together and the modern world is the result of the emergent structure that resulted. As a plug my favorite field relating to this is called stigmergy and basically describes how individual units like ants build intelligent collectives that are far greater than the sum of their parts.