4 ms·
LLMs aren't perfect and they have problems, but often they write better code than humans. At least this human. It seems they run into problems with larger conc
by mythrwy 1mo ago
LLMs aren't perfect and they have problems, but often they write better code than humans. At least this human.
It seems they run into problems with larger concepts and general organization and need guidance at the moment but for a single code file they often do better then I would have.
- bigstrat2003 1mo agoIf an LLM writes better code than you, that says more about you than anything else (either your ability to write code or your ability to evaluate LLMs). The code they write is garbage.
- bonzini 1mo agoThey write garbage if you turn off your brain. They write code as good as yours if you work together.
- noisy_boy 1mo agoI broadly agree with you about improving quality through working together. But even with tons of discussion, they still write code that seems fine from a distance but is weird when you actually get down to actually reading it and thinking about it, line by line. It is not junk but sure as hell I can write tighter and cleaner code and I am a very mediocre programmer. The abundance and frequency of "what, why?!" and "why not just..." reactions I have at LLM code throughout the day has made that much clear to me.
- munksbeer 1mo ago> The code they write is garbage. This is trolling right?
- recursive 1mo agoNo. Sometimes they produce code that's ok in small units, but definitely not all the time.
- literalAardvark 1mo agoIf you write more good code by hand than by agent in 2026 that says more about you than anything else (either your ability to give instructions or your ability to delegate). The code they write is above average.