6 ms·
> Managers get aggregate level view of code quality What's the measure of code quality in this case?
by johntash 2mo ago
> Managers get aggregate level view of code quality
What's the measure of code quality in this case?
- larsien 2mo agoAgree, it is the most important part
- tdu01 2mo agoMy team is hyper productive with Cursor, using different models for different tasks. My senior engineers approve PRs, but it's not humanly possible and is demoralising to review the amount and rate of code being churned. Sure there are a lot of automated tests. We struggle with a measure for code quality that scales. We mitigate by having small releases and running A/B instances but I still lose sleep over pace vs quality.
- Paarthmj 2mo agoPace vs quality is going to be the debate for the next couple years!
- kandros 2mo agoIf quality is the metric, nobody would use something like that, seems like a micromanagement tool
- Paarthmj 2mo agowell, it's not per-engineer. instead, the managers get team-wide metrics so the idea is that they know what the quality of their teams code is, and they can recommend trainings / meetings on how to improve on X part of their AI workflow.
- tysilva 2mo agoIt really does feel like leaders in large organizations are lost on the valuable metrics when it comes to code in general. The mantra seems to often be, make number go higher - regardless of if it's valuable data or not.
- Paarthmj 2mo agoYeah, curating exactly what's important to see as a manager is a difficult part of this journey!
- Paarthmj 2mo agoIt's a combination of DORA metrics (software delivery) + maintainability score + complexity score.