6 ms·
But surely at least one of the websites Anthropic scraped to make Claude had a ToS forbidding automatic access? Why is Anthropic's ToS any more binding than th
by Bratmon 2mo ago
But surely at least one of the websites Anthropic scraped to make Claude had a ToS forbidding automatic access?
Why is Anthropic's ToS any more binding than that of a rabidly-anti-ai literature blog with 50 readers?
- perching_aix 2mo agoDo feel free to read the court documents to find out and let us know. > Why is Anthropic's ToS any more binding than that of a rabidly-anti-ai literature blog with 50 readers? Although I will say, this whole comparison stuff really doesn't seem to be your thing; might impede your analysis quite a lot: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49013148 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49013148 Maybe ask Claude?
- queenkjuul 2mo ago> Why is Anthropic's ToS any more binding than that of a rabidly-anti-ai literature blog with 50 readers? I mean i know you know the answer: anthropic is a corporation with lawyers on retainer, and that's really all that matters
- skybrian 2mo agoOne reason is that they might not have scraped it themselves, so if there was a ToS, it was someone else who broke it. For example, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pile_(dataset) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pile_(dataset) Another reason is that if you can download a web page without agreeing to a ToS, I'm not sure that counts as one?