5 ms·
While my sibling comment said it all, note that destroying them also costs money, hence if those can't be sold, it's a loss of profit already, lower the price a
by zb3 2mo ago
While my sibling comment said it all, note that destroying them also costs money, hence if those can't be sold, it's a loss of profit already, lower the price and let people eat..
> higher costs.
Higher costs of what? Of those new fruits? Well, maybe wasting food should cost?
- s1artibartfast 2mo agoDestroying food is pretty cheap. you put it in the dumpster. Picking through it, sending it to a shelter, and vetting the people at the shelter seems more expensive. > Well, maybe wasting food should cost? Why? Wasting food should be be free. The owner paid for it.
- zb3 2mo ago> Destroying food is pretty cheap. you put it in the dumpster. Picking through it, sending it to a shelter, and vetting the people at the shelter seems more expensive. But at least first lowering prices until they reach 0 seems cheaper? > Why? Wasting food should be be free. The owner paid for it. Because that's a vile thing to do when someone else wants to eat it, don't you think?
- UltraSane 2mo agoGiving away food is pretty cheap. You just put it on a shelf with a big "FREE" sign.