9 ms·

More interesting would be the IP!

• regecks 2mo ago
  You don't need it, they've migrated to motherless.xxx.
  • toomuchtodo 2mo ago
    > Stuart Lawley, the CEO of ICM Registry--the company behind the XXX top level domains, says XXX sites should help empower parents to keep their kids away from adult content. https://www.cnet.com/news/privacy/man-behind-xxx-domains-says-theyll-help-parents-protect-kids/ https://www.cnet.com/news/privacy/man-behind-xxx-domains-say...
    • gpm 2mo ago
      Also in the US - strange choice
    • odo1242 2mo ago
      Well that's kinda the whole idea of having an "adult content" tld; it's so you can block all .xxx domains instead of having to create a blocklist of sites. Like an opt-in nsfw flag for the internet, basically.
      • wildzzz 2mo ago
        Sure but that doesn't really work with the existing age verification laws. Unless .xxx is requiring domains to implement age verification or there's some sort of global redirect to a verification portal, that site is back in the same legal jeopardy of having Texas confiscate their domain again.
        • odo1242 2mo ago
          The article in the comment I was replying to wasn't talking about age verification laws, they were talking about "parents protecting kids", a.k.a. content filtering. As for the other part, I'd just assume that they wanted to switch to a registrar more used to adult content websites and less likely to be impacted by the Texas govt. Just like pirate sites switch TLDs to the ccTLD of the country least likely to prosecute them all the time. I was mostly just talking about the fact that registering a domain with a registrar that is about "XXX sites should help empower parents to keep their kids away from adult content" isn't necessarily a bad thing.
• monksy 2mo ago
  https://ipinfo.io/185.107.81.233 https://ipinfo.io/185.107.81.233