5 ms·
Right… and still 99,99% of everything is held by bsky PDS and goes through their rely and appview… so much for "distributed federation"
by ktosobcy 2mo ago
Right… and still 99,99% of everything is held by bsky PDS and goes through their rely and appview… so much for "distributed federation"
- well_ackshually 2mo agoIn the same way that 99.99% of standard mastodon users are on mastodon.social, yes. No, the million of users sharing porn on entirely isolated mastodon instances that absolutely nobody wants to federate with because you'd be exposed to pictures of minors within 5 minutes do not count.
- archagon 2mo agoA bizarre exaggeration. In my feeds, maybe 1/4 to 1/3 of the people I follow use non-.social instances. The same cannot be said of Bluesky.
- pfych 2mo agomaybe 1/2 of the people in my bsky feeds use non bsky pds'es & clients?
- polymer8563 2mo agocheck your sources
- Vinnl 2mo agoMastodon.social is too big, but it is on a different scale: https://arewedecentralizedyet.online https://arewedecentralizedyet.online (Though I do agree it's partially irrelevant, depending on what problem you're trying to solve.)
- ktosobcy 2mo agoyeah… but nope. yes, mastodon.social is big but there is more plurality. There is about 250k users on mastodon.social while whole fediverse is about 10 milion On the other hand while tere is roughly 35 milion bluesky users there is only ~50k on non-blusky PDSes (https://blue.mackuba.eu/directory/pdses https://blue.mackuba.eu/directory/pdses) so there's that…