7 ms·

This is one of those vanity blog posts, a “look at us, we’re open” blog posts without actual openness, or rather, limited openness where it helps their image an

by gortok 2mo ago

This is one of those vanity blog posts, a “look at us, we’re open” blog posts without actual openness, or rather, limited openness where it helps their image and not openness that could backfire. Businesses don’t operate based on revenue. They operate based on profit. They operate based on operating expenses. They operate based off of free cash flow. Showing off revenue and number of accounts is showing off a tiny portion of the picture, and says nothing about the health of a business. If you’re looking to ‘be open’ about the health of your business, then the operating costs would be shared, the amount the founders are ‘taking out’ of the business in dividends would be shared. There are businesses that operate 20MM a year in revenue, but practically speaking are broke, because of the way the business is being run. So for folks that don’t know better, this is a very cool thing ente is doing. For folks that run businesses and know better, this is a way to show off and ‘gain cred’ without actually having to be open about how the business operates.

jatins 2mo ago
What an unnecessarily negative and cynical reaction to what is neutral at worst and positive at best
deleted 2mo ago
[deleted]
dewey 2mo ago
What's wrong with that? This is a post to show users that other people are paying for it (social proof) and that the project is developing well, similar to other projects sharing how many contributions or first time pull requests they got this month. That doesn't mean that you have to show everyones salary, how much the lunch in the office is costing and include a raw export of their bookkeeping setup. There's room for both.
- chadash 2mo ago
  The accompanying blog post says "The one thing you couldn't see was how well Ente is doing as a business. Now you can." To the parent commenter's point, we don't have enough information to know if that's true. EDIT: the founder is on this thread (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933905 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933905) providing more info and explains that adding expenses on would be too burdensome.
- Grombobulous 2mo ago
  I’ll also add that private companies don’t have to do this at all. So, yes, by comparison, this is very open. Is it marketing material? Also yes. People who are considering using a small scale alternative to tech giant products will probably look at this and say “oh, this product has some traction, and this isn’t a fly by night business.”
monooso 2mo ago
> Businesses don’t operate based on revenue. They operate based on profit. This does not bode well for the entire AI industry.
- gortok 2mo ago
  Public IPO as Ponzi scheme/shell game is a time-honored tradition. You can operate at a loss so long as you can get folks to bet they’ll get a return. The more people you can convince, the better you can do for yourself without being left holding the bag.
turbocon 2mo ago
They poster goes into more details here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933905 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933905 But also, this is not a very constructive comment. They're pushing a new product that based on the upvotes this community is interested it.
jadbox 2mo ago
> "Showing off revenue and number of accounts is showing off a tiny portion of the picture" Showing revenue is not "tiny" by any means. Considering that the vast majority of businesses hide this from the public, I think it's very notably "something larger than tiny". > "but practically speaking [they] are broke" How do you know this?
- iamjs 2mo ago
  >> "but practically speaking [they] are broke" > How do you know this? They were not claiming a fact, they were posing a hypothetical.
  - satvikpendem 2mo ago
    They mean even in the hypothetical how would they know, without open books? They're just theorizing, same as with revenue.
    - PaulDavisThe1st 2mo ago
      It is not theorizing to say "a company with $N of revenue and ($N - $1) of operating costs is essentially broke". Of course, the whole point is that you typically would have no idea of the numbers unless the books are open and include both numbers. Which Ente is not doing.
  - gortok 2mo ago
    I’m speaking of things I have personally witnessed; but won’t go into more detail than that, for various reasons.
    - IndySun 2mo ago
      >...won't go in the more detail...various reasons... I wish you had said that in your opening comment. Would've helped me consider where you were coming from. I'm just making an overall remark, wondering what you're inferring, and more widely still digesting this entire post.
jeswin 2mo ago
All you saw on that page was the revenue? For a potential customer deciding whether to trust a relatively small app (compared to Google and Apple) with their memories, these are useful numbers. 50% increase in paying customers this year. Nearly half a million registered users, with a 40% growth in the last 6 months. 5% of their users are paying customers. Revenue topping a million. That's stuff I want to know if I'm subscribing and uploading all my pics to their servers. I want to know if they'll be around, and my stuff is safe. > So for folks that don’t know better, this is a very cool thing ente is doing. For folks that run businesses and know better... Oh please. Perhaps work on not jumping to conclusions too quickly.
- KomoD 2mo ago
  > That's stuff I want to know if I'm subscribing and uploading all my pics to their servers. I want to know if they'll be around, and my stuff is safe. How do those numbers tell you that, though? Profit would be a better indicator of how likely they are to still be around tomorrow, in my opinion at least.
comprev 2mo ago
I once worked for a company where they operated in the red for 95% of the year as they paid for project material costs up front. The CFO was quite open about how finances worked in our niche sector. A client would pay an invoice and the balance would swing from -£20M to £0 and back down to -£15M for the next project within weeks! Revenue was in the £100Ms per annum. As someone with almost zero business background it was a real eye opener how much we depended on a healthy relationship with the local bank manager. The business model clearly worked as they passed their 30th anniversary during my employment!
- minraws 2mo ago
  This is very common in a lot of industries especially physical goods and medicine. You end up leverage for all the goods but the final settlement of payment happens much later, making them hard to survive in without a lot of capital and good relationships. You can screwed very easily and understanding the model and not scaling faster than your capital allows is a skill in itself. My friend failed at it while I was working with them.
  - comprev 2mo ago
    I tip my hat to those who have the stomach to run a business like that.
- deleted 2mo ago
  [deleted]
- thevillagechief 2mo ago
  I worked for similar company. And yes, it basically depended on the relationship with the local bank managers and suppliers. Unfortunately, it wasn't so successful.
ikidd 2mo ago
>Businesses don’t operate based on revenue Well, you have that right. But apparently they IPO based on even less.
dismalaf 2mo ago
> Businesses don’t operate based on revenue. They operate based on profit. The most difficult part of a consumer SaaS or really selling anything on the internet is acquiring customers. Zero revenue = zero profit automatically with no ability to ever make a profit. If a startup has paying customers there's at least the chance to become profitable.

by gortok 2mo ago

jatins 2mo ago

What an unnecessarily negative and cynical reaction to what is neutral at worst and positive at best

deleted 2mo ago

[deleted]

dewey 2mo ago

What's wrong with that? This is a post to show users that other people are paying for it (social proof) and that the project is developing well, similar to other projects sharing how many contributions or first time pull requests they got this month. That doesn't mean that you have to show everyones salary, how much the lunch in the office is costing and include a raw export of their bookkeeping setup. There's room for both.

chadash 2mo ago
The accompanying blog post says "The one thing you couldn't see was how well Ente is doing as a business. Now you can." To the parent commenter's point, we don't have enough information to know if that's true. EDIT: the founder is on this thread (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933905 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933905) providing more info and explains that adding expenses on would be too burdensome.
Grombobulous 2mo ago
I’ll also add that private companies don’t have to do this at all. So, yes, by comparison, this is very open. Is it marketing material? Also yes. People who are considering using a small scale alternative to tech giant products will probably look at this and say “oh, this product has some traction, and this isn’t a fly by night business.”

monooso 2mo ago

> Businesses don’t operate based on revenue. They operate based on profit. This does not bode well for the entire AI industry.

gortok 2mo ago
Public IPO as Ponzi scheme/shell game is a time-honored tradition. You can operate at a loss so long as you can get folks to bet they’ll get a return. The more people you can convince, the better you can do for yourself without being left holding the bag.

turbocon 2mo ago

They poster goes into more details here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933905 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48933905 But also, this is not a very constructive comment. They're pushing a new product that based on the upvotes this community is interested it.

jadbox 2mo ago

> "Showing off revenue and number of accounts is showing off a tiny portion of the picture" Showing revenue is not "tiny" by any means. Considering that the vast majority of businesses hide this from the public, I think it's very notably "something larger than tiny". > "but practically speaking [they] are broke" How do you know this?

iamjs 2mo ago
>> "but practically speaking [they] are broke" > How do you know this? They were not claiming a fact, they were posing a hypothetical.
- satvikpendem 2mo ago
  They mean even in the hypothetical how would they know, without open books? They're just theorizing, same as with revenue.
  - PaulDavisThe1st 2mo ago
    It is not theorizing to say "a company with $N of revenue and ($N - $1) of operating costs is essentially broke". Of course, the whole point is that you typically would have no idea of the numbers unless the books are open and include both numbers. Which Ente is not doing.
- gortok 2mo ago
  I’m speaking of things I have personally witnessed; but won’t go into more detail than that, for various reasons.
  - IndySun 2mo ago
    >...won't go in the more detail...various reasons... I wish you had said that in your opening comment. Would've helped me consider where you were coming from. I'm just making an overall remark, wondering what you're inferring, and more widely still digesting this entire post.

jeswin 2mo ago

All you saw on that page was the revenue? For a potential customer deciding whether to trust a relatively small app (compared to Google and Apple) with their memories, these are useful numbers. 50% increase in paying customers this year. Nearly half a million registered users, with a 40% growth in the last 6 months. 5% of their users are paying customers. Revenue topping a million. That's stuff I want to know if I'm subscribing and uploading all my pics to their servers. I want to know if they'll be around, and my stuff is safe. > So for folks that don’t know better, this is a very cool thing ente is doing. For folks that run businesses and know better... Oh please. Perhaps work on not jumping to conclusions too quickly.

KomoD 2mo ago
> That's stuff I want to know if I'm subscribing and uploading all my pics to their servers. I want to know if they'll be around, and my stuff is safe. How do those numbers tell you that, though? Profit would be a better indicator of how likely they are to still be around tomorrow, in my opinion at least.

comprev 2mo ago

I once worked for a company where they operated in the red for 95% of the year as they paid for project material costs up front. The CFO was quite open about how finances worked in our niche sector. A client would pay an invoice and the balance would swing from -£20M to £0 and back down to -£15M for the next project within weeks! Revenue was in the £100Ms per annum. As someone with almost zero business background it was a real eye opener how much we depended on a healthy relationship with the local bank manager. The business model clearly worked as they passed their 30th anniversary during my employment!

minraws 2mo ago
This is very common in a lot of industries especially physical goods and medicine. You end up leverage for all the goods but the final settlement of payment happens much later, making them hard to survive in without a lot of capital and good relationships. You can screwed very easily and understanding the model and not scaling faster than your capital allows is a skill in itself. My friend failed at it while I was working with them.
- comprev 2mo ago
  I tip my hat to those who have the stomach to run a business like that.
deleted 2mo ago
[deleted]
thevillagechief 2mo ago
I worked for similar company. And yes, it basically depended on the relationship with the local bank managers and suppliers. Unfortunately, it wasn't so successful.

ikidd 2mo ago

>Businesses don’t operate based on revenue Well, you have that right. But apparently they IPO based on even less.

dismalaf 2mo ago

> Businesses don’t operate based on revenue. They operate based on profit. The most difficult part of a consumer SaaS or really selling anything on the internet is acquiring customers. Zero revenue = zero profit automatically with no ability to ever make a profit. If a startup has paying customers there's at least the chance to become profitable.