7 ms·
I think the point is that there has been a push to move away from this data continuing to be available from these sources.
by ordersofmag 2mo ago
I think the point is that there has been a push to move away from this data continuing to be available from these sources.
- counters 2mo agoThere has not.
- ordersofmag 2mo agoAttempts have been made starting back in 2005 https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/senate-bill/786/text https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/senate-bill/786...
- counters 2mo agoAnd I dare you to find another attempt in the intervening 20 years. Santorum's bill was laughed out of Washington. It stands alone.
- slater 2mo agohttps://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2024/07/noaa-project-2025-weather/678987/?gift=ADN5ex8W_PaQmR-s5dSx2Do21FXUbb4d2XVoxOY40Vw https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2024/07/noaa-pro...
- counters 2mo agoYou do understand how this isn't an example of what I'm asking for, right? In 20 years worth of history - you can't identify a single piece of legislation or a single executive action to demonstrate an ongoing threat to NOAA? You have to immediately jump to the tautology of "Project 2025 is dismantling NOAA because an article two years ago said Project 2025 was going to dismantle NOAA"?
- slater 2mo agohaha yeah why would i believe something Project 2025 stated, haha silly me
- counters 2mo agoIf there is an active attempt at privatizing NOAA then you should be able to point to specific, real-world things that are happening to effect this change.
- mukbangpervert 2mo ago"The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) should be dismantled and many of its functions eliminated" That's a direct quote. The fact that it wasn't first on the list doesn't mean it's not on the list. (no response needed; I know that you're a partisan actor to the degree that direct discussion with you offers no value to myself or to society. You're too dishonest, too sociopathic, and too disinterested in truth.)