5 ms·
If it is not an open source license, you should not call it open source. Imagine someone saying the same thing about MongoDB's license, for example.
by __float 2mo ago
If it is not an open source license, you should not call it open source.
Imagine someone saying the same thing about MongoDB's license, for example.
- Sankozi 2mo agoIs there a Linux server run on fully open source hardware (what would that mean btw?)? Should we stop using "open source" because almost all computers are not fully open source?
- sehansen 2mo agoQuite a lot of open source hardware is licensed under the BY-SA Creative Commons license which is an actual open source license. E.g. the Arduinos and things like the Milkymist One which can actually run linux.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- hannasanarion 2mo agoWhat are you even trying to say? The fact that this is hardware isn't what makes it non-open source, there's plenty of open source hardware out there. The thing that makes it not-open-source is that the license is non-commercial. If you can't legally use the product, the fact that the source is available is meaningless. CC-NC is a source available license, not an open source license.
- dpoloncsak 2mo agoA Raspberry Pi running any flavor of linux, right?