6 ms·
The what and how parts are good but "why webring?" needs to be explained more. If the content is summarized and personalized for the user the search engine is
by chopete3 3mo ago
The what and how parts are good but "why webring?" needs to be explained more.
If the content is summarized and personalized for the user the search engine is already rendering similar pages.
- rhet0rica 3mo agoThis comment is such an elegant Rorschach test. Bravo.
- efilife 3mo agoWhy? Are you implying his lack of imagination? Or how one can interpret the comment?
- rhet0rica 2mo agoThe two key interpretations are as follows: 1. It follows that all of human authorship is pointless since search engines now actively bury content and impede access to written documents. Long Live The New Flesh. 2. Webrings are obviously an artifact of people who hate AI slop and yearn for the simpler days of the older Web, before search engines were effective. Therefore the remark about generated summaries is powerfully sarcastic, as the twain shall never meet. Moreover, Google is no longer fit for purpose, so webrings are an apposite solution to the empty niche of trustworthy discovery mechanisms. Eat The Rich. Which one the author actually meant depends entirely on their literacy regarding the web revival movement.