5 ms·

The irony here is (3) is by far the closest to actually occurring as in practice, it doesn't require amending the constitution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Na

The irony here is (3) is by far the closest to actually occurring as in practice, it doesn't require amending the constitution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Intersta... Of course, the SC could easily declare it unconstitutional....interpret any amendments as they see fit anyway. The decision on the 14th very nearly went the other way.

apparent 3mo ago
> The decision on the 14th very nearly went the other way. Really? How do you know?
- russdill 3mo ago
  Because I read how each justice voted and several justices are advanced in age.
  - apparent 3mo ago
    Counting votes is a rudimentary way to come to the conclusion that it "very nearly went the other way". SCOTUS is much more complex than that, as anyone who follows it knows.