6 ms·
These low effort constant comments about style or formatting are against Hackernews guidelines for discussions and something needs to be done to clean up the co
by iterateoften 3mo ago
These low effort constant comments about style or formatting are against Hackernews guidelines for discussions and something needs to be done to clean up the comment section. Getting to a ridiculous point
- theappsecguy 3mo agoIt's not about style or formatting, people are tired of reading slop.
- horsawlarway 3mo agoThese comments are worse than the slop.
- bspammer 3mo agoThey aren't actually. They make me feel like I'm not going crazy - that I'm not the only person noticing that the quality of the average article on hacker news has dropped off a cliff in the last 6 months. Links from different people with different cultures, life experiences, and languages have the same tone of voice, the same sentence structure, and the same breathless, boring, staccato yet arrhythmic, emotive yet soulless style. I hope everyone keeps pointing it out. Even better, change the site guidelines to make AI generated articles a flaggable offense. It's already been done for comments.
- breakingcups 3mo agoHear hear. I can't believe people are content to consume slop like this.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- aeturnum 3mo agoIf comments about how "this blog post could have been a link to this github repo" are in-bounds, so are comments about how "this could have been a link to a LLM session." HN has always tried to work out if a submission is novel and interesting work or is just a slick coat of paint on mundane work (sometimes if good work is obscured by insufficiently clever presentation). Highlighting that content was generated by an LLM and asking if that impacts how to understand it is entirely in keeping with our culture and standards.