6 ms·
Thanks! If you don't mind a suggestion: I would probably list it in [1], given how many programs depend on it. [1] https://fil-c.org/programs_that_work https:/
by dataflow 3mo ago
Thanks! If you don't mind a suggestion: I would probably list it in [1], given how many programs depend on it.
[1] https://fil-c.org/programs_that_work https://fil-c.org/programs_that_work
- pizlonator 3mo agoIt’s not inline assembly It’s module assembly They’re different
- dataflow 3mo agoI'm confused; did you reply on the wrong thread, or am I misunderstanding something? I was merely suggesting it'd be good to mention Boost on your website and how well it works with Fil-C. This suggestion was not specifically regarding anything called assembly; it was just a general comment. I merely mentioned it because you were here.
- pizlonator 3mo agoOoh - I thought you meant adding boosts use of assembly to the list of inline asm use cases I get you now