6 ms·

If it's a one off and needs no or minimal maintenance work afterwords, sure. If it's intended to be actively maintained, then you probably should understand ho

If it's a one off and needs no or minimal maintenance work afterwords, sure. If it's intended to be actively maintained, then you probably should understand how things work, unless you want to wipe everything and start from scratch when the LLM creates such a mess that it can't be sorted out.

user43928 3mo ago
[flagged]
- discreteevent 3mo ago
  It's interesting user43928 that you only created your account here 19 days ago and that every one of your comments is pro AI. You don't comment on anything else. Also interesting that you promote Fable by name here (it was only released 2 days ago). (Don't worry, I know I'm rowing against the tide with this comment. The AI people have decided to destroy the commons for a few more millions on top of the billions they have already been given. It's a shame.)
  - program_whiz 3mo ago
    What's crazy is the prompt must be something like "pro-AI but still believable and measured", since its "fixed my iOS app albeit with back and forth". Interesting, they know the HN crowd for sure.
  - user43928 3mo ago
    Is that surprising, considering I'm using AI a lot? I have not hand written a single line of code in months on my side projects. Obviously I am also interested in discussing the latest model. Your claim that I promote anything or otherwise don't engage here in good faith is both misplaced and against the site rules.
    - deleted 3mo ago
      [deleted]
    - inigyou 3mo ago
      What was the back and forth?
      - user43928 3mo ago
        Since it couldn't reproduce the issue in the iOS simulator, I had to run it on the device, reproduce the issue, and provide the logs. This went on for many rounds, during which I tried to steer it toward what I thought was the source of the bug, while the model mostly kept adding instrumentation and logs. In the end the cause was not what I suspected, but reasonably close to it via another mechanism.

user43928 3mo ago

[flagged]

discreteevent 3mo ago
It's interesting user43928 that you only created your account here 19 days ago and that every one of your comments is pro AI. You don't comment on anything else. Also interesting that you promote Fable by name here (it was only released 2 days ago). (Don't worry, I know I'm rowing against the tide with this comment. The AI people have decided to destroy the commons for a few more millions on top of the billions they have already been given. It's a shame.)
- program_whiz 3mo ago
  What's crazy is the prompt must be something like "pro-AI but still believable and measured", since its "fixed my iOS app albeit with back and forth". Interesting, they know the HN crowd for sure.
- user43928 3mo ago
  Is that surprising, considering I'm using AI a lot? I have not hand written a single line of code in months on my side projects. Obviously I am also interested in discussing the latest model. Your claim that I promote anything or otherwise don't engage here in good faith is both misplaced and against the site rules.
  - deleted 3mo ago
    [deleted]
  - inigyou 3mo ago
    What was the back and forth?
    - user43928 3mo ago
      Since it couldn't reproduce the issue in the iOS simulator, I had to run it on the device, reproduce the issue, and provide the logs. This went on for many rounds, during which I tried to steer it toward what I thought was the source of the bug, while the model mostly kept adding instrumentation and logs. In the end the cause was not what I suspected, but reasonably close to it via another mechanism.