> Agreed. It does not automatically mean, however, that it can be significantly improved with better variant interpetation or better analysis of the same wgs da

> Agreed. It does not automatically mean, however, that it can be significantly improved with better variant interpetation or better analysis of the same wgs data in general sense. I wouldn't say anything is automatic or taken for granted, but it is actually relatively common for more thorough reanalysis to uncover something that the first pass missed. I hinted at this in the post, but the reason that this doesn't happen today is human bandwidth. A core part of my thesis is that that this highly specialized human bandwidth can be scaled with AI. It may work. It may not work. But I would feel bad if I didn't give it a try. > Happy to see it. I wish you all the luck and will be the first one praising your solution if I see convincing results. Appreciate that! Hopefully, they will come.