5 ms·
That's pretty irrelevant isn't it? Shouldn't all users demand privacy, especially from ads?
by partiallypro 3mo ago
That's pretty irrelevant isn't it? Shouldn't all users demand privacy, especially from ads?
- dotcoma 3mo agoAll users should demand privacy, but they don’t. Take a look at Firefox’s market share, or Brave’s etc.
- JumpCrisscross 3mo agoWon’t Brave follow Google’s lead on this? Gecko, WebKit and—hopefully—Ladybird are the true alternatives. I used to think this was too extreme. But the ad vendor dragging ad blockers out of the engine flipped my view.
- dotcoma 3mo agoBrave, like Vivaldi, I think, have developed their own ad blocker. No idea if they will fight to keep UBlock Origin accessible or not. I think and certainly hope that Helium will fight the good fight.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- pseudalopex 3mo ago> Won’t Brave follow Google’s lead on this? They said they could offer limited MV2 support even after it’s fully removed from the upstream Chromium codebase.[1] [1] https://brave.com/blog/brave-shields-manifest-v3/ https://brave.com/blog/brave-shields-manifest-v3/
- riffraff 3mo agoBrave has its own ad blocker engine built-in rather than as an extension, and it can reuse uBlock's lists https://github.com/brave/adblock-rust https://github.com/brave/adblock-rust I use brave on my phone and I can't really tell the difference from desktop browser+UO, so I guess it works well enough.