7 ms·

I'm playing the newest games on ddr3 with a 2080 and a 4790k. It's a simple life.

by functionmouse 4mo ago

stuxnet79 4mo ago
Some might call this a boomer build but the 4790k is an absolute beast of a CPU and still holds up.
- arjie 4mo ago
  I recently booted up an old 4790k system and it was fine on Linux but on Windows it would nag me to update but apparently the CPU is too old for new Windows. I ended up giving it away on the Internet to whomever could pick up but afterwards it ended up with one of those reseller chaps. Ah well, I wish it had made to some kid somewhere.
  - functionmouse 4mo ago
    That makes sense. I'm on Windows 10 LTSC so I don't get nags and scare screens from Microsoft as much as a regular machine might.
  - stuxnet79 4mo ago
    > Windows it would nag me to update but apparently the CPU is too old for new Windows When I was trying to upgrade to Windows 11 from Windows 10 I got the same warning. It is the reason why I'm now happily running Xubuntu on the same machine. I did end up installing a Windows 11 VM (VirtualBox) which works perfectly fine running as a guest under Xubuntu on a 4790k (screw you Microsoft). But I otherwise never want go back to Windows as a daily driver. The enshittification just got too much for me.
- antonyt 4mo ago
  I got a 4700k in 2013 for 200 bucks from Microcenter. The thing has been continuously in service ever since. It's my "homelab" box now.
sixothree 4mo ago
I played 100+ hours of RDR2 on a 2060 (non-super), as was the style at the time. When the 30 series came out, I sold that card for more than I paid for it.
deaton 4mo ago
I've got a 9 year old Xeon W and 64GB of DDR4. Its not as fast as some modern DDR5 stuff, but boy does it work
voidUpdate 4mo ago
2080? I'm still using a 1070. That thing rocks
- hstaab 4mo ago
  1070 as well. Probably one of the best ROIs from a single component
- mrec 4mo ago
  <FourYorkshiremen>Luxury.</FourYorkshiremen> I'm still using a 1650 Super with 4GB VRAM and it's basically fine. Holding off on a few newer titles, but I'm old and my eyesight is going so 1080 resolution is plenty for me.
robertkarl 4mo ago
it's also a capable local inference stack!
ragequittah 4mo ago
Here I'm on a 5800x and a 4070ti super and it's woefully inadequate for some games. Though I suppose if you play at 1080p (which is hard to look at these days for me) you might be OK on low-medium settings in some newer games. I can't see you getting very far with something like Forza Horizon 6 or Death Stranding 2 though.
- bigstrat2003 4mo ago
  Brother, I'm on a 3070 Ti and I can play basically all games at full settings at 1900x1200 resolution. I've only found one game where I had to turn the settings down (Talos Principle 2). Most games aren't really demanding.
  - ragequittah 4mo ago
    I suppose if you turn off ray tracing and don't mind 1900x1200. I'm trying to push 1440p w/ ray tracing. Sometimes 4k if it's a good TV game. I'm constantly having to turn settings down to get >60 fps. These days more and more games seem like they expect some sort of ray tracing to get the full experience. It's also quite nice to actually hit 165 fps in some less demanding games on my 165 hz monitor.
    - Altern4tiveAcc 4mo ago
      I guess you and the other poster just have different standards. I've personally never found Ray Tracing to be worth the performance impact. I have a 3090 and a 7900 XT at home, on different computers. When opening a new game, I just keep everything on Medium, turn RT off if possible, and enjoy good fps at 4K in most games. Doom The Dark Ages was the only one that didn't perform as well as I'd like. Still, perfectly playable at 1080p, Medium settings, targeting 120+ fps.
drnick1 4mo ago
Presumably, this is at 1080p, which looks terrible after you experienced 4K. It's better than nothing, and I probably wouldn't build a 4K rig in this market, but let's not pretend you can get a modern gaming experience out of that old hardware.
- TheAmazingRace 4mo ago
  In my humble opinion, 4K gaming is rather overrated. I find high refresh rates at 1440p to be the sweet spot and you don't have to get a top-end GPU to drive it at ultra settings in games.
  - functionmouse 4mo ago
    If I could buy a 1080p RGB stripe OLED for my next monitor, I would.
  - bigstrat2003 4mo ago
    Not just "rather overrated", it's completely overrated. There just isn't a big difference in visual quality with 4k. It is primarily driven by companies trying to sell gear, not by it actually looking better.
    - drnick1 4mo ago
      > There just isn't a big difference in visual quality with 4k. You really need to get your eyes checked.
hinata08 4mo ago
I went back to fanless PCs on DDR3 to build personal servers as well, while my laptop to go to conventions will remain that old Fujitsu lifebook thing with more tape AI bros are building something fantastic, but let's not forget that value isn't necessarily brought by sheer prices

I'm playing the newest games on ddr3 with a 2080 and a 4790k. It's a simple life.

stuxnet79 4mo ago

Some might call this a boomer build but the 4790k is an absolute beast of a CPU and still holds up.

arjie 4mo ago
I recently booted up an old 4790k system and it was fine on Linux but on Windows it would nag me to update but apparently the CPU is too old for new Windows. I ended up giving it away on the Internet to whomever could pick up but afterwards it ended up with one of those reseller chaps. Ah well, I wish it had made to some kid somewhere.
- functionmouse 4mo ago
  That makes sense. I'm on Windows 10 LTSC so I don't get nags and scare screens from Microsoft as much as a regular machine might.
- stuxnet79 4mo ago
  > Windows it would nag me to update but apparently the CPU is too old for new Windows When I was trying to upgrade to Windows 11 from Windows 10 I got the same warning. It is the reason why I'm now happily running Xubuntu on the same machine. I did end up installing a Windows 11 VM (VirtualBox) which works perfectly fine running as a guest under Xubuntu on a 4790k (screw you Microsoft). But I otherwise never want go back to Windows as a daily driver. The enshittification just got too much for me.
antonyt 4mo ago
I got a 4700k in 2013 for 200 bucks from Microcenter. The thing has been continuously in service ever since. It's my "homelab" box now.

sixothree 4mo ago

I played 100+ hours of RDR2 on a 2060 (non-super), as was the style at the time. When the 30 series came out, I sold that card for more than I paid for it.

deaton 4mo ago

I've got a 9 year old Xeon W and 64GB of DDR4. Its not as fast as some modern DDR5 stuff, but boy does it work

voidUpdate 4mo ago

2080? I'm still using a 1070. That thing rocks

hstaab 4mo ago
1070 as well. Probably one of the best ROIs from a single component
mrec 4mo ago
<FourYorkshiremen>Luxury.</FourYorkshiremen> I'm still using a 1650 Super with 4GB VRAM and it's basically fine. Holding off on a few newer titles, but I'm old and my eyesight is going so 1080 resolution is plenty for me.

robertkarl 4mo ago

it's also a capable local inference stack!

ragequittah 4mo ago

Here I'm on a 5800x and a 4070ti super and it's woefully inadequate for some games. Though I suppose if you play at 1080p (which is hard to look at these days for me) you might be OK on low-medium settings in some newer games. I can't see you getting very far with something like Forza Horizon 6 or Death Stranding 2 though.

bigstrat2003 4mo ago
Brother, I'm on a 3070 Ti and I can play basically all games at full settings at 1900x1200 resolution. I've only found one game where I had to turn the settings down (Talos Principle 2). Most games aren't really demanding.
- ragequittah 4mo ago
  I suppose if you turn off ray tracing and don't mind 1900x1200. I'm trying to push 1440p w/ ray tracing. Sometimes 4k if it's a good TV game. I'm constantly having to turn settings down to get >60 fps. These days more and more games seem like they expect some sort of ray tracing to get the full experience. It's also quite nice to actually hit 165 fps in some less demanding games on my 165 hz monitor.
  - Altern4tiveAcc 4mo ago
    I guess you and the other poster just have different standards. I've personally never found Ray Tracing to be worth the performance impact. I have a 3090 and a 7900 XT at home, on different computers. When opening a new game, I just keep everything on Medium, turn RT off if possible, and enjoy good fps at 4K in most games. Doom The Dark Ages was the only one that didn't perform as well as I'd like. Still, perfectly playable at 1080p, Medium settings, targeting 120+ fps.

drnick1 4mo ago

Presumably, this is at 1080p, which looks terrible after you experienced 4K. It's better than nothing, and I probably wouldn't build a 4K rig in this market, but let's not pretend you can get a modern gaming experience out of that old hardware.

TheAmazingRace 4mo ago
In my humble opinion, 4K gaming is rather overrated. I find high refresh rates at 1440p to be the sweet spot and you don't have to get a top-end GPU to drive it at ultra settings in games.
- functionmouse 4mo ago
  If I could buy a 1080p RGB stripe OLED for my next monitor, I would.
- bigstrat2003 4mo ago
  Not just "rather overrated", it's completely overrated. There just isn't a big difference in visual quality with 4k. It is primarily driven by companies trying to sell gear, not by it actually looking better.
  - drnick1 4mo ago
    > There just isn't a big difference in visual quality with 4k. You really need to get your eyes checked.

hinata08 4mo ago

I went back to fanless PCs on DDR3 to build personal servers as well, while my laptop to go to conventions will remain that old Fujitsu lifebook thing with more tape AI bros are building something fantastic, but let's not forget that value isn't necessarily brought by sheer prices