4 ms·
None? All of these things were in flight for a while and given Zigs anti-AI stance i think they wrote off Bun ever since the acquisition
by dzbarsky 4mo ago
None? All of these things were in flight for a while and given Zigs anti-AI stance i think they wrote off Bun ever since the acquisition
- dnautics 4mo agowhat anti-ai stance? i have multiple projects in zig that are pretty much written by AI, no problem.
- mihaelm 4mo agoThey're probably refering to their strict "No LLM / No AI" policy: https://codeberg.org/ziglang/zig/src/branch/master/README.md#strict-no-llm-no-ai-policy https://codeberg.org/ziglang/zig/src/branch/master/README.md... which applies to contributing to the Zig project. The "contributor poker" blog post should probably be a required reading to understand where it comes from: https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/ https://kristoff.it/blog/contributor-poker-and-ai/ "Anti-AI stance" is painting it with too broad of a brush. You're definitely not breaching any CoC or whatever by using AI for your Zig projects.
- epolanski 4mo agoAnd the largest Zig projects all make use of AI assistance to build software.
- dnautics 4mo ago> too broad of a brush yes, that was my point. as domeone who uses ai extensively to write zig (and someone who has made very small non-AI cobtributions to zig in the past), rejecting ai is currently a strategically good decision for core zig.