9 ms·
That's because your usecases were simple and/or small. Otherwise, you would have known. Unless you don't have experience and you believe the whole "You are ri
by mg794613 4mo ago
That's because your usecases were simple and/or small.
Otherwise, you would have known.
Unless you don't have experience and you believe the whole "You are right! it _is_ a and not b" bs...
- cortesoft 4mo agoOr, perhaps, you are the one who is mistaken and other people ARE having success with large and complex programs? I am not saying you ARE wrong, but I don’t know how you could be so certain that no one else is having success with complex, AI written, code. There are well known, established, and respected engineers creating AI projects right now. For example, antirez, the creator of Redis, created the DS4 project. When you see these sorts of projects, do you never think, “Maybe I might be wrong about this.”?
- vga1 4mo agoSuch absolutely unfounded confidence is impressive.
- nipah 4mo agoOkay, doubt. What level of complexity you believe this project has? Including the changes that required changing burn-cubecl. https://github.com/mii-nipah/voxcpm-rs https://github.com/mii-nipah/voxcpm-rs --- Just to be clear, I'm not saying they don't make mistakes. In fact I constantly scream into the void with the sheer amount of absolute stupidity of those models, however I would never say, using them for what I use, that they can only be used for simple and small use cases.