5 ms·
Writing quality was distracting. Very breathey. Hard to understand if I was getting important information or not -- but it's ok, some people will defend this st
by sokka_h2otribe 4mo ago
Writing quality was distracting. Very breathey. Hard to understand if I was getting important information or not -- but it's ok, some people will defend this style.
- pwatsonwailes 4mo agoIt's written by an AI. That's why it's a bit shit.
- vessenes 4mo agoI'd put my money on "edited by an AI". Some of it feels info-dense enough to be a person.
- nicbou 4mo agoIt's written like a LinkedIn post, with the TED Talk pauses for effect. I've come to filter out anything written in that style.
- stabbles 4mo agoYou can look at a histogram of number of words per sentence, and you'll find immediately that it's written by an AI. When? Today. Minutes. Four years. $54 million. Collect feedback. Delivered faster. Not days. Not weeks. It's free. ... No $19 million in upfront costs. They're now doing meaningful work. Let me put that in context. That's a 95% cost reduction. But think about what that represents. And we can show you how.
- hallway_monitor 4mo agoThe only time I want to read something written by AI is when I am interacting with an LLM directly. I don’t know who these people are that think others want to read their slop. Even if the content is good, I can’t stand reading it.
- panny 4mo agolol, I copied the first 4 paragraphs into gptzero and it confirms, 100% ai generated. Which makes this submission against HN guidelines...