7 ms·
Sure, we agree there. But it seems to me that if the LLM can effectively "execute" the instruction of how to take an input IP packet and generate a response IP
by fl7305 4mo ago
Sure, we agree there.
But it seems to me that if the LLM can effectively "execute" the instruction of how to take an input IP packet and generate a response IP packet based on a set or rules, then that's effectively a general purpose processor. And not an "auto completer", right?
- mystifyingpoi 4mo agoThat's one way to look at it, but you're right - taking "autocompletion" to the extreme, we arrived at a task executor.
- fl7305 4mo agoTo me, "autocompletion" means a pure lookup function input->output. That's a lot different from "general purpose processor which can act based on program logic, stored data, and input data".