6 ms·
They are mostly blaming their shift to vibe coding for their problems. https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/an-update-on-github-availability/ https://
by pyb 5mo ago
They are mostly blaming their shift to vibe coding for their problems. https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/an-update-on-github-availability/ https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/an-update-on-...
- valleyer 5mo agoHm. I read that as saying that their users are writing more code with the assistance of LLMs, thus placing more stress on their systems. I do not read it as making any comment about their own practices.
- HDBaseT 5mo ago[dead]
- pyb 5mo agoOh you're right, I misread. They're actually blaming their customer's vibe coding on their problems. I which case I call BS
- Klathmon 5mo agoIn our internal metrics you can see a clear increase in PRs and CI runs in general that tracks with agentic coding adoption, and it's significant, so I absolutely buy that GitHub would be struggling to take the brunt of that without big changes
- jjayj 5mo agoBut GitHub's postmortems are usually related to internal rollouts rather than traffic load
- thom 5mo agoA charitable view might be that changing which fingers you're using to plug the holes in the dike is a lot harder when the volume of water on the other side is increasing exponentially.