4 ms·
No? WSL is Linux on Windows — so W9xSL is Linux on Windows 9x. I think… :)
by GranPC 5mo ago
No? WSL is Linux on Windows — so W9xSL is Linux on Windows 9x. I think… :)
- mrweasel 5mo agoWSL is "Windows Subsystem for Linux", so this should be "Linux Subsystem for Windows 9x"
- GranPC 5mo agoBy Microsoft’s convention, that would be a way to run Windows 9x on Linux. It’s a bit confusing. Another example is “Windows Subsystem for Android”, which is what they use for running Android apps on Windows. I think the idea is that it’s not a “Windows Subsystem” for X, but rather a Windows “Subsystem for X”. (Edited: mixed it up on the last sentence.)
- zingmars 5mo agoYeah it makes more sense if you consider the word Windows' to be in possessive form.
- mrweasel 5mo ago> that would be a way to run Windows 9x on Linux Which is exactly what the post says this is. It's running Windows 9x on Linux kernel. It's strangely worded, but from the follow up comment, and the readme in the repo it seems clear that it's running on the Linux kernel.
- andai 5mo ago> WSL9x runs a modern Linux kernel (6.19 at time of writing) cooperatively inside the Windows 9x kernel Pretty sure it's the other way around. But I haven't had my coffee yet ;) Microsoft's naming scheme confuses me every single time though: "Windows Subsystem for Linux" actually runs Linux on Windows...
- mrweasel 5mo agoYou're correct: "WSL9x runs a modern Linux kernel (6.19 at time of writing) cooperatively inside the Windows 9x kernel" I missed the part that it runs on the bloody Windows 9x kernel, I was to busy thinking about modern Windows.