5 ms·
So Anthropic degraded their product. OAI updated their product to meet for exceeded Anthropic old product. This is normal behavior and not a cause for such a h
by luddit3 5mo ago
So Anthropic degraded their product. OAI updated their product to meet for exceeded Anthropic old product.
This is normal behavior and not a cause for such a hyperbolic response.
- pizzly 5mo agoThis is the benefits of competition in action
- solenoid0937 5mo agoTo be clear, unsustainably hemorrhaging money to gain marketshare over a competitor is generally considered an anticompetitive practice.
- toraway 5mo agoWhat if both competitors are doing it?
- justapassenger 5mo agoIt’s also THE playbook of the Silicon Valley.
- guzfip 5mo agoAlso why there’s so much enthusiasm for it on HN
- solenoid0937 5mo agoThere is good competition and bad competition. Pricing your product unsustainably vs a competitor to gain market share is regarded as "bad competition" and has historically been seen as anticompetitive. It does not benefit the consumer in the long run, because the goal is to use your increased funding or cash reserve to wipe your competition out of the market, decreasing competition in the long term. Then, once your competition is gone, and you've entrenched yourself, you do a rug pull.
- byzantinegene 5mo agoyou're right but for now it doesn't matter if both competitors are running on infinite vc money, we as consumers benefit from it. it only matters if they cause negative externalities in the meantime