5 ms·
Age verification now required for DNS resolution
- ozlikethewizard 6mo agoToo believable for an april fools :( Palantir really was the icing
- T3RMINATED 6mo ago[dead]
- ranger_danger 6mo agoApril Fools.
- geetee 6mo agolmao almost got me. scary times...
- Molitor5901 6mo agoToo close for comfort.. I could believe this was true just about any other time..
- DougN7 6mo agoThey got me - with age enforcement in the OS I figured it was the next step. Bad joke in my opinion.
- drivingmenuts 6mo agoFirst thought: well, that figures.
- close04 6mo agoSome April Fools jokes hit too close to home to make. Does easydns really want to have their brand associated with this kind of news in a world where so many people just read the title?
- drnick1 6mo agoI know this is April 1, but you should really run your own DNS server.
- StuntPope 6mo agojust one?
- Henchman21 6mo agoOne local unbound process seems to work quite well for me
- StuntPope 6mo agoYou're thinking of resolvers.
- waltbosz 6mo ago"Thank you for your attention in this matter" (eyeroll). That's what tipped me off that it was a joke. Well and the absurdity of it.
- StuntPope 6mo ago[flagged] lol.
- mmh0000 6mo agoI know this is a joke. But, with the way the world is headed, this seems "likely". My question is, say a law was passed that effectively outlawed unauthenticated and unlogged DNS access. Could that be implemented today with something like DoH and client certificates? I found this draft that seems to cover some possible future implementation: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-tjjk-cared-00.html https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-tjjk-cared-00.html and: https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/1n5vji7/is_dns_over_tls_dot_mtls_client_authentication/ https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/1n5vji7/is_dns_... This might be a fun weekend project for me... Ugh rabbit holes.
- RishabhGarg12 6mo agoThis is exactly what we need to protect the children!